Subject: newfound philippine octapoint misqualified by its discoverer etc
Date: Aug 15, 2006 @ 07:05
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next
Prev    Post in Time    Next


i see here our local encyclopedist has made a mere
octosecondary point out of his & our fantastic new
philippine octaquaternary finding
ph2bi3al4cadagulelimasata
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadripoint#Octopoint_or_octosecondary_point
& this a scant paragraph or 2 after an almost
perfectly correct explanation of our dear original &
objective bp multidimensional classificational &
nomenclatural system
presumably by his fellow unknown wikiclopedist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadripoint#Secondary_quadripoints

so no wonder they are mixing everything up over there
with each hand not quite knowing what any other is
doing

but most entertainingly the resulting botch job smacks
of some of the choicest misconstruals & butcherings of
our equally dear original & objective abcde visitation
quality classification scale
hahahahaha

still
we can feel far more gratified than misunderstood by
it all
as we do seem to have found here the true local source
of this fresh discovery & report
whoever he or she may be
& who is in any case worthy of great honor for
bringing it to our notice
as well as for setting a new working record for extant
multifoldness

&
one further observation on this marvelous occurrence &
experience
is that it was not entirely unexpected
but was actually predicted
when 2006 was correctly identified as a year of
destiny for octapointing
in the course of this years bp inaugural tour
conducted on new years day
as you may also recall
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/19062


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com