Why not claves (en- or ex-) of the second and third degrees?

Lowell G. McManus
Leesville, Louisiana, USA

----- Original Message -----
From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: need this info.

> thanx & glad you were able to get back for this
> question
>
> & now that i see your answer i think you have
> interpreted it correctly
> while i mistook the actual question for a different
> one
>
> but for purposes of the best available topological
> nomenclature
> now that we are discussing this
> i feel the terms counter & counter counter are
> slightly puzzling or perhaps even misleading
> since there is no presumption that anything is
> necessarily counter or against anything else in such a
> case
> but rather merely enclosed or embedded again within
>
> so i would suggest
> tho admittedly none of these are quite perfect either
> reverse or inverted or reciprocal claves or even clave
> holes
> &
> double reverse or doubly inverted or twice
> reciprocated clave
> respectively
>
> --- Brendan Whyte <bwhyte@...> wrote:
>
>> an enclave within an enclave within an enclave I
>> call a counter-counter-enclave.
>> An enclave in an enclave is simply a
>> counter-enclave.
>>
>> Brendan in Germany.
>>
>> > Subject: Need this info!
>> >
>> > Could you let me know the name of the situation of
>> an enclave within
>> > an enclave within an enclave in India-Bangladesh?
>> 3 degrees.
>> >
>> > IMNaanu
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>