Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] nile source try cum rwtzug visit is a puzzling success
Date: Apr 05, 2006 @ 19:29
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> other reports reaffirm nyungwe forest is righthttp://www.lse.co.uk/ShowStory.asp?story=ZX524067R&news_headline=nile_explorers_arrive_home_
> being at the head of the rukarara branch of a
> tributary of the kagera
>
>http://news.africast.com/africastv/article.php?newsID=58311
>http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/mapcenter/map.aspx?TextLatitude=39.45&TextLongitude=-98.907&TextAltitude=0&TextSelectedEntity=39070&SearchEnc=false&MapStyle=Comprehensive&MapSize=Large&MapStyleSelectedIndex=0&searchTextMap=mont+luhonge&MapStylesList=Comprehensive&ZoomOnMapClickCheck=on
> oops again
>
> also clarifying is
> http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/N/NI/NILE.htm
> 3 scroll clicks down
> under sources of nile
>
> so the earlier report erred in placing the source
> only
> 66 miles from lake victoria but was right about
> nyungwe
>
> the headstream can even be followed from there on
> the
> encarta map
> so it isnt such a mystery after all
>
> any rwtzug details are still elusive tho
>
> --- aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...> wrote:
>
> > hot news of completion of corrected sawanabori of
> > the
> > nile
> > http://www.itn.co.uk/news/index_2068754.html
> > presumably including a careful rwtzug visit
> > but with a puzzle or 2
> >
> > for the nyungwe forest that is named by the
> reporter
> > as the source point isnt really 66 river miles
> above
> > lake victoria as claimed
> > but actually hundreds of air miles beyond that
> >
> > oops
> >
> > i do tend to trust everything else about the
> report
> > tho
> > based on this earlier notice of the expedition
> > http://www.ascendthenile.co.uk/expedition.html
> > in which the stated intention of ascending the
> > kagera
> > is what alerted me to the fact that this truth
> head
> > party would necessarily visit rwtzug
> >
> > aka the rwanda tanzania uganda tripoint
> >
> > which is known to be at the thalweg junction of
> the
> > kakitumba with the kagera
> > per brownlie
> >
> >
> >
> > this map suggests that the writer simply confused
> > the
> > nyungwe forest
> > which is outlined in grayish green at dead center
> in
> > southwest rwanda
> > with another famous rwandan national park named
> > akagera
> > which is also shown in green outline
> > but in the necessarily correct location in
> > northeastern rwanda
> >
>
> >__________________________________________________
> > & the true nile source location 66 river miles
> from
> > lake victoria must be in the northernmost reaches
> of
> > that correct green outline
> > as you can see if you will pan east once
> >
> >
> > except
> > there is one more puzzle
> > for the kagera is known to continue falling from
> > many
> > miles farther south than 66 river miles above
> > victoria
> > http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/K/Kagera.asp
> >
> > another oops perhaps
> > but i will reserve judgment on that one
> > for it could simply be a misprint for 166 or 266
> or
> > something
> > placing the true source point that much farther
> > south
> >
> >
> > of course i will be looking out now for the early
> > rushes from the expedition
> > not only for further clarification & more details
> of
> > their truly monumental discovery of the corrected
> > sawanabori point
> > but perhaps even more expectantly for any first
> word
> > or image of our virgin rwtzug tripoint
> > at the most significant confluence & moment of
> truth
> > en route to their river source target
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>