ahh jimi you point hound
for of course you are right
but it is just that up til now we have been specially
distinguishing this singular moment of conscious
awareness of delivering the coup de grace
but i agree why not prolong such pleasure as much as
possible
so 14 kilometers
no problem
especially if you really can stay aware of your
intention across such a span of time & space
but still
the tripoint itself awaits precise discovery just as
much in the case of cfcgcm as of eglysd
so maybe consciousness of moment point really is just
as essential as of geographical point
--- jim van dura <
jimvandura@...> wrote:
> But Bwana, what you are suggesting is that these
> folks
> most probably did pass directly through the CFCGCM
> tripoint as they navigated down the Sangha thalweg!
> For even if they misjudged their already only
> approximated tripoint location by 14 kilometers of
> river at the time of their GPS reading try, we can
> still be pretty sure they got just as close to the
> true CFCGCM tripoint at some point in their overall
> try as the EGLYSD folks got to their target at 14
> meter GPS range of its known geocoordinates. In
> fact,
> these CFCGCM devotees are likely to have gotten even
> closer because they seem to have realized they were
> on
> the correct line for both CFCM and CGCM, but simply
> had no clue as to the true point of convergence with
> that line of the phantom geodetic CFCG. (And datum
> wasn't even an issue for them!) So, since you have
> accorded Class C honors to the EGLYSD folks at their
> unmarked destination, how can you confer less on
> these
> CFCGCM folks?? To conclude their try was probably
> elusive just because their GPS moment came a bit
> late
> is to miss the greater probability that their try
> was
> as successful as could possibly be, except that it
> was
> without a precise moment of culmination awareness.
> So
> isn't that still a presumptive Class C as in "see"
> (or
> even Class B as in "be") rather than a merely
> "earnest
> but elusive" Class E? --Jimi
>
> --- aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...> wrote:
>
> >
> http://zoltantakacs.com/zt/er/water/album.php?idx=1
> > & i dont know what to make of this gps reading
> since
> > it does seem to be quite a bit off here
> > when compared to these geocoords taken from
> > brownlies
> > sketch maps
> >
>
http://home.worldonline.dk/jesniel/border/african_tripoints.htm#cmcfcg
> > which are also substantially confirmed by encarta
> >
>
http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/mapcenter/map.aspx?TextLatitude=39.45&TextLongitude=-98.907&TextAltitude=0&TextSelectedEntity=39070&SearchEnc=false&MapStyle=Comprehensive&MapSize=Large&MapStyleSelectedIndex=0&searchTextMap=bomassa&MapStylesList=Comprehensive&ZoomOnMapClickCheck=on
> >
> > so i surmise the photo was actually taken a few
> > reaches down the sangha or dzanga from the real
> > tripoint
> >
> > but their intention is clear & they were at least
> > definitely on the right river
> > & thus must have passed right thru the very near
> > neighborhood of this thalweg tripoint
> > however unwittingly at the time
> >
> > & since there is not even a witness marker to go
> by
> > in
> > this rather remote area
> > & there is no indication that they were
> > multipointing
> > nuts
> > they could easily be indulged for seeming so far
> off
> > target in such a case
> >
> > views of the neighborhood such as these are still
> > pretty rare
> >
>
http://www.worldwildlife.org/expeditions/car/photo_album2.html
> >
>
http://www.worldwildlife.org/expeditions/car/photo_album.html
> >
> >
> > cfcgcm as in
> > cf central african republic
> > cg congo brazzaville the new au chair
> > & cm cameroun
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com