aha i see youve been busy
very nice

the question of style is interesting as well as
complicated
but obviously the styles of markers always have far
more to do with the particular arrangements that were
made by the latest demarcation commission
in each individual case
than with any reliable principle regarding who or what
necessarily trumps what or whom

& these arrangements tend to vary according to
exigencies & expediencies as much as they do according
to anyones preferences
so any inferences we may draw about their causes are
at great risk of being partial or mistaken

--- Jesper Nielsen <jesniel@...> wrote:

> The Soviet Union seems to get things their way at
> border demarcation:
>
>
>
> NORU:
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=118
>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=118&c2=107>

> &c2=107
>
>
>
> FIRU:
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=118
>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=118&c2=49>

> &c2=49
>
>
>
> LTPL:
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=86
>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=86&c2=114>

> &c2=114
>
>
>
> BYPL:
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=11
>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=11&c2=114>

> &c2=114
>
>
>
> PLUA:
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144
>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144&c2=114>

> &c2=114
>
>
>
> SKUA:
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144
>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144&c2=124>

> &c2=124
>
>
>
> HUUA:
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144
>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=144&c2=65>

> &c2=65
>
>
>
> ROUA probably:
>
> http://www.macalik.cz/fotky/rum/hranice.JPG
>
>
>
> MDUA: no known evidence
>
>
>
> GETR: no known evidence
>
>
>
> AMTR: no known evidence
>
>
>
> AZTR: no known evidence
>
>
>
> AZIR: no known evidence
>
>
>
> AMIR: no known evidence
>
>
>
> TMIR: no known evidence
>
>
>
> AFTM: no known evidence
>
>
>
> AFUZ: could this be a marker? Otherwise no known
> evidence
>
>

http://postconflict.unep.ch/photos/afghanistan/assessment/team4/amu_darya_at

> _friendship_bridge_(23_sept_2002)_photo_2.html
>
>
>
> AFTJ: no known evidence
>
>
>
> CNTJ: no known evidence
>
>
>
> CNKG: no known evidence
>
>
>
> CNKZ: no known evidence
>
>
>
> CNRU:
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=30
>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/border.php?c1=30&c2=118>

> &c2=118
>
>
>
> MNRU:
>
> http://www.bluepeak.net/mongolia/tavanbogd.html
>
>
>
> PKRU: no dry border
>
>
>
>
>
> But when if comes to dry tripoints, we don't have
> RU/SU get their way, but
>
>
>
> we have
>
>
>
> FINORU:
>
>

http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/tripoint.php?c1=118

>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/tripoint.php?c1=118&c2=49&c3=107&orienta

> tion> &c2=49&c3=107&orientation=
>
> which is Scandinavian style
>
>
>
> PLSKUA:
>
>

http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/tripoint.php?c1=144

>

<http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase/tripoint.php?c1=144&c2=114&c3=124&orient

> ation> &c2=114&c3=124&orientation=
>
> which is sort of western European style
>
>
>
> CNMNRUE:
>
> http://www.canonfans.com/digest/6/27514120221.htm
>
> which is Chinese style
>
>
>
> Jesper
>
>
>
> --
>
> Borderbase - your online guide to international
> borders and tripoints
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
>
>
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com