My apologies for inadvertently mistitling as well as
initially misdirecting to BorderPoint alone the
attached earlier post, when I intended it mainly for
BoundaryPoint ... and am retitling and redirecting it
so, herewith. -- Jimi

--- jimvandura <jimvandura@...> wrote:

> Nice going, you Kabuki lovebirds!
>
> CNLA Numbers 29 & 35, I agree ... except to add, "No
> doubt about it!"
>
>
> And with Number 29 at Mohan/Boten at least hopefully
> centered here as Ban-Boten:
>

http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/MapCenter/Map.aspx?

> TextLatitude=20.0668994135588&TextLongitude=
>

-96.8662960544436&TextAltitude=9&TextSelectedEntity=8339055&SearchEnc=false&Ma

>

pStyle=Comprehensive&MapSize=Small&MapStyleSelectedIndex=0&searchTextMap=laos&

>

MapStylesList=Comprehensive&ZoomOnMapClickCheck=on&ResultsListbox=20.0668994

> 135588%3B
>

-96.8662960544436%3B9%3B8339055%3BDos+Botellas%2C+Veracruz%2C+Mexico%3BSm

> all%3BComprehensive ,
> though we still don't know which way this CNLA
> numbering sequence runs, we can at least
> guess with some confidence that the 1992 CNLAVN --
> whatever its CNLA number may
> once have been (i.e., tops or zero) -- has recently
> been replaced by a tripartite marker:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/borderpoint/message/19
> and also that CNLAMM, at the other CNLA terminus, is
> Mekong-wet and so unmarked ...
>
> ... and yet likely also closely witnessed by an
> essentially identical CNLA marker, numbered
> either N, as in maximum, or else 1, or 0, or 00,
> etc., as in minimum ...
>
>
> So, although we are certainly not yet looking
> squarely at a surrogate for the elusive
> CNLAMM here, I believe we are already able to
> imagine what one of its Witness Marks (or
> its only Witness Mark, since both CNMM and LAMM are
> unmarked river borders at that
> point) looks like.
>
> Admittedly, not quite as good as not quite as good
> as CNLAMM. Yet there you have it such
> as it most probably and most nearly is ...
>
> -- Jimi
>
>
>
> --- In borderpoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter
> Smaardijk" <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> >
> > Marker no. 29 is possibly at the border crossing
> Mohan - Boten. See
> >
>

http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/lachine/2003/0309/22.htm

> , where a no.
> > 29 is mentioned.
> > Peter
> >
> > --- In borderpoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper
> Nielsen" <jesniel@i...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the links.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You could be right, as usual
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jesper
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > Fra: borderpoint@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:borderpoint@yahoogroups.com] På
> > > vegne af Peter Smaardijk
> > > Sendt: 5. december 2005 16:33
> > > Til: borderpoint@yahoogroups.com
> > > Emne: [borderpoint] Re: Nice Laos marker
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cf. also marker no. 35 at
> > >
> http://www.rockmekong.org/photo/he105_12/index.htm
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > --- In borderpoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter
> Smaardijk"
> > > <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Don't know, but it could be on the border with
> China. Cf. the
> > > marker
> > > > shown at
> http://www.thailine.com/edh/special.htm , which is
> > similar
> > > > (but we're looking at the Chinese side here).
> > > >
> > > > And the border demarcation between the two
> countries was "settled
> > > in
> > > > 1992", acc. to
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

http://english.people.com.cn/english/200011/09/eng20001109_54745.html

> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > --- In borderpoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper
> Nielsen"
> > <jesniel@i...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
>

<http://www.northeast.org.sg/funds/dtdf/alexkoh/photogallery.htm>

> > > > >
> >
>

http://www.northeast.org.sg/funds/dtdf/alexkoh/photogallery.htm

> -
> > > > Look for
> > > > > Loas section
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Wonder which border?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jesper
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Borderbase - your online guide to
> international borders and
> > > > tripoints
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SPONSORED LINKS
> > >
> > >
> > > Politics
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> > t=ms&k=Politics&w1=Politics&w2=Government&c=2&
> > > s=30&.sig=eyLi-tNN5P27l4G_zKXuxw>
> > >
> > > Government
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?
> > t=ms&k=Government&w1=Politics&w2=Government&c=
> > > 2&s=30&.sig=4AXPayeGvJzzIl1ivQ98IA>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * Visit your group "borderpoint
> > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/borderpoint> " on
> the web.
> > >
> > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
> to:
> > > borderpoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > <mailto:borderpoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
> > subject=Unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> Yahoo!
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of
> Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _____
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com