Subject: AW: AW: [BoundaryPoint] 1806 bavaria coburg meinengen tripoint now looking like de2byth near plesten
Date: Nov 22, 2005 @ 14:43
Author: Wolfgang Schaub ("Wolfgang Schaub" <Wolfgang.Schaub@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> Thank you for the stimulation. Like always, we justhaha not me of course
> need a kick in the ass.
> Before even consulting the additional mapshttp://www.ena.lu/europe/success%20crisis/iron%20curtain%20border%20point%20
> suggested, I agree giving more
> credit to the "Plesten" tripoint alternative, for
> the following reasons:
>
> Looking at the picture
>
> three%20territories%201965.htm we have to imagine angood nice
> arrangement of these
> markers such that their engravings face the
> countries that they stand for.
> This is only possible in a sensible way at the
> Plesten (Eastern) tripoint,
> and it is impossible at the Western tripoint between
> Weitramsdorf and
> Ummerstadt.
> If we assume the picture is taken towards East, thecould be barbaria oops i mean bavaria
> central stone with the
> GO then faces SW, right towards the Coburg portion
> of Sachse-Coburg. The
> left stone with the presumed AL on it is placed in a
> 90-degree angle facing
> NE, looking into the narrow "lobe/lappet/flap" of
> Sachse-Meiningen, and the
> small stone to the right may look anywhere it likes
> as long as it is true
> that it is "only" a marker of the next-best village.
> Such a setting wouldnice
> not be possible at the Western tripoint, even if we
> twist our heads.
> The hypothesis is "supported" by the fact that thereyes & we have a road near my above guess too
> is a country road going
> from Plesten toward NE that touches the
> Bavaria/Thuringia border precisely
> at the place where the pic may have been taken.
> Imagining somebody takinggood
> border pictures in the Cold War this would only have
> been "safe" if you took
> them either from a public road or out of the window
> of your car. Approaching
> the border on foot from the West, across open
> fields, was thrilling if not
> dangerous - again, the "easiest" pic-taking position
> for a journalist was NE
> of Plesten. The Western tripoint is not accessible
> by car.
> Additional support for the hypothesis is provided byall fine mysteries & good reasons to advance the try
> the fact that you see
> the border running through the background of the
> picture (the white poles),
> nicely in conformance with my 1: 300,000 road map.
> Well, I also have maps 1
> : 200,000, and quickly making looky-looky on those
> does not produce anything
> in addition, nor to the contrary.
>
> Unfortunately, these bloody markers and poles do not
> throw shadows
> supporting the hypothesis.
>
> Remains the mystery what the stone left in the
> picture wants to tell us. I
> cannot find anything like AL in the Plesten area,
> nor can I find anything on
> the Western tripoint. Apart from abbreviations such
> as "M" for Meiningen one
> may expect on such stones the abbreviation for
> "Herzogtum" = H, so that "HM"
> would make sense to me.
> Now I did something that I better had not done: Ihttp://www.stadt.coburg.de/dokumente/a-331-staatsvertrag.pdf
> consulted my
> 24-volume-strong Meyer's Conversation Lexicon for
> the "well-educated
> classes", dated 1890. Over many pages all the nice,
> complex histories of
> those duchies is displayed in all splendour.
> In conclusion, I did not find any clue, only
> complete confusion. I learned
> that Meiningen came to Altenburg in 1660, that there
> was a duchy of
> Gotha-Altenburg from 1707 onwards, and that only in
> 1826 Sachsen-Meiningen
> got the size that it has on the map
> http://www.ieg-maps.uni-mainz.de/gif/71th_a4.htm . A
> duchy of
> Sachsen-Coburg-Gotha exists only from 1826 onwards.
>
> I did not find an explanation for the fact that
> border stones apparently
> have been set in 1806, a time when Napoleon ruled
> and threw everything up in
> the air. But it wouldn't come as a surprise to me
> anymore learning that in
> 1806 the Coburg part was Gotha and the Meiningen
> "bit" belonged to
> Altenburg.
>
> Finally I tried to attain the ultimate wisdom by
> searching for Plesten in
> the www. Among the 850 or so hits I learned that
> Anna Margaretha Bauersachs,
> descendent of people from Plesten in
> Sachsen-Coburg-Gotha died in Newark,
> New Jersey, in 1906. Sorry, too late, otherwise we
> may have asked her.
>
> I also learned that there was a "Freistaat Coburg"
> from November 1918 to
> July 1, 1920, when the "Freistaat" Bavaria grabbed
> it, omiting a few
> enclaves - something for our enclave freaks to delve
> in.
>
> THIS was the moment! - aha - and I had blamed thegreat idea
> American army for adding
> to the confusion!
>
> We may have it easier if we simply ask the owner of
> the website where the
> pic was taken.
> Wolfganghttp://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/MapCenter/Map.aspx?TextLatitude=39.45
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von
> aletheia kallos
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. November 2005 02:36
> An: boundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: [BoundaryPoint] 1806 bavaria coburg
> meinengen tripoint now
> looking like de2byth near plesten
>
>
> wolfgang & or anyone else who is trying to get this
>
> let me try to be clearer because i believe there has
> been a breakthru now
>
> please compare the 2 tricolor tripoints you have
> selected due west & due east of coburg here
> http://www.ieg-maps.uni-mainz.de/gif/71th_a4.htm
> with the same locations on any modern map of the
> bavaria thuringia state line
> such as hopefully this one if it works or better
>
>&TextLongitude=-98.907&TextAltitude=0&TextSelectedEntity=39070&SearchEnc=fal
>se&MapStyle=Comprehensive&MapSize=Small&MapStyleSelectedIndex=0&searchTextMa
>p=germany&MapStylesList=Comprehensive&ZoomOnMapClickCheck=on
>http://multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?client=public&X=1243750&Y=6460000&width=7
> but of course preferably use as fine a map as
> possible
> & certainly with modern subdivisional entities &
> their
> borders included if possible
> since they could give just the final clues that are
> needed to identify this as a living tripoint
> if it still is one
>
>
> now the bavaria thuringia border may not be entirely
> the same as the coburg meinengen border
> but these 2 bavaria coburg meinengen tripoints &
> their
> vicinities dont look any different on both those
> borders actually from 1848 to 2005
> so far as i have been able to discern
> & so
> all else being equal
> i agree
> go either east or west from coburg
>
>
> but in fact according to this 1812 map
> http://www.ieg-maps.uni-mainz.de/gif/p812d_a3_mb.gif
> only the tripoint to the east of coburg is looking
> very likely to have been any kind of a bavaria
> tripoint as early as 1806
>
>
> this location btw appears to be at or very near a
> place called plesten
> with byth again hopefully indicated as a dashed line
> here
>
>00&height=400&gride=&gridn=&srec=0&coordsys=mercator&db=DE&addr1=&addr2=&add
>r3=&pc=&advanced=&local=&localinfosel=&kw=&inmap=&table=&ovtype=&zm=0&in.x=6
> &in.y=6&scale=50000=== message truncated ===
> all too crudely of course
> but thats the rough idea anyway
>
>
> & this may well be virtually qed on jespers pic
> if its caption is not mistaken
>