I appreciate your thoughts well. But since all we do is nonsense anyway, it
does not matter how non-sensical we are in our hobbies.
Greetings to all multipointers who wish to make a point,
Wolfgang
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von aletheiak
Gesendet: Montag, 31. Oktober 2005 23:02
An:
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [BoundaryPoint] Re: SMh
may i say i find your itsm2chermhe call far more credible than this smh
claim or try
for of course castles do grow on mountains
just as lightning rods or tv dishes etc grow from castles
& all that is well only natural
so to disallow such manmade objects as these in determining the extremities
of manmade
objects such as countries is completely inconsistent & makes no sense at all
to my thinking at least
& for you to then require yourself to figure out
exactly
where nature ends & human nature begins
hahaha
well that would be pure masochism if it werent already a punctological
impossibility
as i think you must have realized there already
& as i also recently saw at the base of a similar tower that had been built
upon us2mah
but was there some indication that this castle marked an internal multipoint
of san marino
more likely one castello for each municipality there i would think
such cute places as san marino tho do present great opportunities for
cardinal news tours
& extremity star tours etc
which synthesize multipointing of a sort
or recombine it in a way
by artificially assembling all the extremities of a given place into one
place
& thus in the present example multiplying smh by smn & sme & smw & sms &
perhaps
even sml & smm too
all in a single 5 or 6 or 7pointed star presentation
& such combinative multipointing as that would be the only multipointing
possible
if places didnt also meet naturally
at individual multipoints
luckily for us
but at all events there you have 2 different descriptions of pursuits that
might answer to
the same name of multipointing
original or natural multipointing as it were & synthetic or manmade
multipointing
but at all events it seems to me
in collecting extremities just as in addressing single multipoints
even the slightest degree of moderation or compromise or exceptionalism
would belie the
earnestness & authenticity of the try
so i think for example you were much closer to smh in the moments when you
were the
highest man in san marino than in the moments when you were at the foot of
the tower
for you were still attached to & really a part of physical san marino at
both of those points
& if you were jumping or flying over the highest point of san marino
you would still be in san marino too
but above rather than at or upon its highest point
& i realize such a recognition of the obvious may make it especially hard on
hapless
highpointers
who might then have to go climb trees or crucifixes or whatever object they
find rises
highest from any given place
but happily it keeps all claimants equally honest
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@i...> wrote:
>
> This is my interpretation of SMh.
>
>
>
> But hard to determine on this place were this castle seems to grow on the
> mountain.
>
>
>
> I was also inside the tower of
> http://i1.trekearth.com/photos/9179/san_marino.jpg, which made me the
> highest man in SM for a few minutes.
>
>
>
> Such a cute little country.
>
>
>
> Jesper
>
> --
>
> Borderbase - your online guide to international borders and tripoints
>
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
>
Yahoo! Groups Links