Subject: highly plausible iljosy photo try tho still of unknown accuracy<br/>
Date: Sep 18, 2005 @ 04:16<br/>
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next<br/>
<a href="18361.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="18363.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1006187033"><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.worldisround.com/articles/16078/photo11.html">http://www.worldisround.com/articles/16078/photo11.html</a><br/>
this is the de jure aka pre1967 position & so really<br/>
only a ghost <br/>
<br/>
topo<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://sunsite.berkeley.edu:8085/israel/50k/09-36-120-3.jpg">http://sunsite.berkeley.edu:8085/israel/50k/09-36-120-3.jpg</a><br/>
where the mentioned yarmuch river & el hama village<br/>
are discernible<br/>
& where the actual or de facto iljosy is also in frame<br/>
farther up the yarmuch on the golan heights<br/>
tho not indicated as such<br/>
& not really a tripoint any more but rather a triline<br/>
of sorts<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.passia.org/palestine_facts/MAPS/Golan_Heights_West_Bank_under_occupation.htm">http://www.passia.org/palestine_facts/MAPS/Golan_Heights_West_Bank_under_occupation.htm</a><br/>
<br/>
<br/>
		<br/>
__________________________________ <br/>
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors&#39; Choice 2005 <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a></div>