Subject: Re: answer to extra credit question<br/>
Date: Jul 31, 2005 @ 23:02<br/>
Author: Martin Pratt (&quot;Martin Pratt&quot; &lt;m.a.pratt@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="18184.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic18144.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="18184.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="18186.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1737372727">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@y...&gt;<br/>
wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; but then<br/>
&gt; just out of curiosity<br/>
&gt; can you confirm if the newly agreed aivg alignment<br/>
&gt; reaches the same provisional tripoint specified in the<br/>
&gt; gbus treaty<br/>
&gt; namely<br/>
&gt; nlat 17d57m51s x 63d53m53s wlong<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I haven&#39;t yet seen the text of the agreement but I&#39;d be surprised if<br/>
it didn&#39;t confirm the provisional tripoint. I&#39;ll chase it up when I<br/>
get back to the UK (later this week). <br/>
<br/>
m a r t i n</div>