Subject: correction in view of inukshuk as territorial marker
Date: Jul 27, 2005 @ 15:55
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia kallos <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> probably erroneous but unqualified & uncorrected
> reports recently posted to the normally reliable int
> boundaries list & borderpoint
> are now being reiterated routinely by major media
>
> the 3rd paragraph from the end here
> http://www.macleans.ca/topstories/politics/news/shownews.jsp?content=n072643A
> repeats the apparent misinformation about hans island
> having cadk littermates
> that was apparently first published in the 4th
> paragraph from the end here
> http://north.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filename=hans_island25072005
> & reported on those lists
>
> the facts however apparently remain
> http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/DNK-
CAN1973CS.PDF
> http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/maps/ls72small.php
> http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/ls072.pdf
> all of which explains why this is not a dispute at all
> but simply an agreement to differ & party share
> liberally toasted thru the years with all the
> necessary drinks winks & diplomatic protestations
> but in any case
> so far as is definitely known
> involving only a single island
> which the parties have deliberately enshrined in this
> unique way
>
> note especially the 2 special cacadkdk party share
> multipoints at opposite ends of the island
> which qualifies it in this way not as a no mans land
> nor an everyones land
> but as an eithers land
> or an informal time share condominium
>
> these multipoints are no mistake or accident or
> liberal sprinkling
> but indeed the only known such pair in the world
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com