Subject: fresh cninpk try is for indira col rather than karakoram pass<br/>
Date: May 25, 2005 @ 14:42<br/>
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next<br/>
<a href="17821.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="17823.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-813106228">news report<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1375562,001300270001.htm">http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1375562,001300270001.htm</a><br/>
<br/>
maps & background<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/kashmir_disputed_2003.jpg">http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/kashmir_disputed_2003.jpg</a><br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/siachen.htm">http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/siachen.htm</a><br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.indiatogether.org/2004/aug/pce-siachen.htm">http://www.indiatogether.org/2004/aug/pce-siachen.htm</a><br/>
<br/>
but it is hard to tell if there is enough political<br/>
will even now for the frozen parties to climb down<br/>
from & out of their respective ice cubes<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
note<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.kashmirsentinel.com/apr1999/3.9.html">http://www.kashmirsentinel.com/apr1999/3.9.html</a><br/>
mentions that the 1963cnpk cession was subject to<br/>
renegotiation after final inpk settlement <br/>
but that this provision was unilaterally revoked by<br/>
china in 1987<br/>
so realistically it is looking like india will have to<br/>
accept a cninpk position somewhere along the karakoram<br/>
ridge line in any case<br/>
<br/>
& it appears indira col is the present de facto cninpk<br/>
anyway<br/>
contrary to my assertions in<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/17388">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/17388</a><br/>
&<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/16561">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/16561</a><br/>
<br/>
i should have remembered<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/9955">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/9955</a><br/>
which was accurate<br/>
& now looks almost prescient<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
still no pix or other hard data found for this<br/>
location yet tho <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a></div>