a now slightly more educated guess is
not really a ghost nor actually all within germany
oops
but
a surviving working atde rock
between the german state of bayern & the austrian
state of tirol
but likewise apparently between the bavarian regions
of oberbayern & schwaben & thus also the corresponding
tirolean subdivision of reutte
hence
the living international tertiary tripoint
atde2bytr3obresc

--- aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...> wrote:

> aha no problem of course
> & right on 241
>
>
> this new ghost you bring tho may have been the
> augsburg bavaria tirol tricountry stone of 1785 thru
> the early 1800s
> if the hand carved signpost is correct
>
> however
> i see that tripoint is shown as a probable wetpoint
> on
> this contemporary map
>

http://www.rootsweb.com/~deubadnw/history/maps/d1789.jpg

> so there remains at least this much of a mystery
>
> the fact that the rock is still standing may
> indicate
> that it continues to mark something
>
> my guess is not directly on atde
> but a short distance within germany
>
> --- marcelmiquelcat
> <marcelmiquel@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Ooops! Sorry, the link was wrong.
> > The correct one is:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/4a643
> >
> >
> > Can somebody traslate the link I've previously
> > posted? I think it's
> > an internal tripoint.
> >
> >
> > marcel
> >
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> > <aletheiak@y...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > yikes
> > > but whats this
> > >
> > > must be the wrong link
> > > for all i can figure
> > > so please confirm or correct
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > "marcelmiquelcat"
> > > <marcelmiquel@c...> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The 241 marker ( photo 8 )
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>

http://www.allgaeu-ausfluege.de/alpindreilaendereck.htm

> > > >
> > > > marcel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > "aletheiak"
> > > <aletheiak@y...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > but impossible according to my eyes
> > > > > since your f002 had a post directly beside
> it
> > & a different
> > > setting
> > > > > & your fd was on the same face as your
> number
> > > > >
> > > > > clearly marcels is a similar danzig german
> > rock but not f002
> > > > >
> > > > > & since marcels is near the confluence my
> > guess is thats
> > > f001
> > > > >
> > > > > & from the looks of it probably not far from
> > depl 241 & danzig
> > > > > poland e006 as seen in the other pic
> > > > >
> > > > > but what do you think the german says anyway
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> "Jesper
> > Nielsen"
> > > > > <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, also according to the German text.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jesper
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: marcelmiquelcat
> > > > > > To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 4:57 PM
> > > > > > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Ghost tp
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is this the same bordermarker?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> >
> http://www.zollgeschichte.de/monatskarten/01_00.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > > > marcel
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> > aletheia kallos
> > > > > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > > wow beauty
> > > > > > > & it evidently indicates a dry
> tripoint
> > marked by depl
> > > > > > > monument 241
> > > > > > > the very rock in the 5th pic from the
> > bottom of the
> > > > > > > sabaoth link
> > > > > > > yikes
> > > > > > > which i now see is even captioned
> > dreilaenderstein
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > busting both our guesses at once
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > & contrary to versailles article 100
> as
> > well
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > but probably an ad hoc decision by the
> > commission in
> > > > > > > article 101
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > & this same pic is also remarkable for
> > appearing to
> > > > > > > show the alignment with another border
> > rock in the
> > > > > > > near background
> > > > > > > resembling the blocky danzig poland
> > series
> > > > > > > hence the hypothetical terminal rock
> > e006
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > & then returning to your friends map
> > > > > > > note the next divagation of the danzig
> > german border
> > > > > > > from the nogat river
> > > > > > > above & opposite wernersdorf
> > > > > > > where it now seems even likelier that
> at
> > least the
> > > > > > > danzig german f002 marker will be
> found
> > & probably
> > > > > > > others
> > > > > > > possibly both f001 & f003
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- Jesper Nielsen <jesniel@i...>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A reliable friend sent me this link
> of
> > the topomap:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > >
> >
>

http://www.chem.univ.gda.pl/~tomek/image/sztum1931.jpg

> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jesper
> > > > > > > > >thats strange
> > > > > > > > >since according to this site
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
>http://sabaoth.infoserve.pl/danzig-online/grenze/grenzee.html
> > > > > > > > >this tripoint was wet
> > > > > > > > >& specifically in the vistula river
> > at the nogat
> > > > > > > > confluence
> > > > > > > > >where one might have expected only
> an
> > indirect
> > > > > > > > demarcation
> > > > > > > > >& more likely by means of the
> > terminal marker of
> > > > > > > > the e sector
> > > > > > > > >e006
> > > > > > > > >&or the initial marker of the f
>

=== message truncated ===

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/