Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Ghost tp
Date: Mar 15, 2005 @ 22:37
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>http://www.allgaeu-ausfluege.de/alpindreilaendereck.htm
>
> Ooops! Sorry, the link was wrong.
> The correct one is:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/4a643
>
>
> Can somebody traslate the link I've previously
> posted? I think it's
> an internal tripoint.
>
>
> marcel
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> <aletheiak@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > yikes
> > but whats this
> >
> > must be the wrong link
> > for all i can figure
> > so please confirm or correct
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> "marcelmiquelcat"
> > <marcelmiquel@c...> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The 241 marker ( photo 8 )
> > >
> > >
>
> > >http://www.chem.univ.gda.pl/~tomek/image/sztum1931.jpg
> > > marcel
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> "aletheiak"
> > <aletheiak@y...>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > but impossible according to my eyes
> > > > since your f002 had a post directly beside it
> & a different
> > setting
> > > > & your fd was on the same face as your number
> > > >
> > > > clearly marcels is a similar danzig german
> rock but not f002
> > > >
> > > > & since marcels is near the confluence my
> guess is thats
> > f001
> > > >
> > > > & from the looks of it probably not far from
> depl 241 & danzig
> > > > poland e006 as seen in the other pic
> > > >
> > > > but what do you think the german says anyway
> > > >
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper
> Nielsen"
> > > > <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, also according to the German text.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jesper
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: marcelmiquelcat
> > > > > To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 4:57 PM
> > > > > Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Ghost tp
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this the same bordermarker?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> http://www.zollgeschichte.de/monatskarten/01_00.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > marcel
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com,
> aletheia kallos
> > > > > <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> > > > > > wow beauty
> > > > > > & it evidently indicates a dry tripoint
> marked by depl
> > > > > > monument 241
> > > > > > the very rock in the 5th pic from the
> bottom of the
> > > > > > sabaoth link
> > > > > > yikes
> > > > > > which i now see is even captioned
> dreilaenderstein
> > > > > >
> > > > > > busting both our guesses at once
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & contrary to versailles article 100 as
> well
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but probably an ad hoc decision by the
> commission in
> > > > > > article 101
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & this same pic is also remarkable for
> appearing to
> > > > > > show the alignment with another border
> rock in the
> > > > > > near background
> > > > > > resembling the blocky danzig poland
> series
> > > > > > hence the hypothetical terminal rock
> e006
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > & then returning to your friends map
> > > > > > note the next divagation of the danzig
> german border
> > > > > > from the nogat river
> > > > > > above & opposite wernersdorf
> > > > > > where it now seems even likelier that at
> least the
> > > > > > danzig german f002 marker will be found
> & probably
> > > > > > others
> > > > > > possibly both f001 & f003
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Jesper Nielsen <jesniel@i...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > A reliable friend sent me this link of
> the topomap:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> >
>
> > > > > > >=== message truncated ===
> > > > > > > Jesper
> > > > > > > >thats strange
> > > > > > > >since according to this site
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
>http://sabaoth.infoserve.pl/danzig-online/grenze/grenzee.html
> > > > > > > >this tripoint was wet
> > > > > > > >& specifically in the vistula river
> at the nogat
> > > > > > > confluence
> > > > > > > >where one might have expected only an
> indirect
> > > > > > > demarcation
> > > > > > > >& more likely by means of the
> terminal marker of
> > > > > > > the e sector
> > > > > > > >e006
> > > > > > > >&or the initial marker of the f
> sector
> > > > > > > >f001
> > > > > > > >than by means of this apparent line
> stone numbered
> > > > > > > f002
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >for here the border evidently
> followed a fence line
> > > > > > > >which suggests the location may be
> near
> > wernersdorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >where the border did leave the river
> > > > > > > >rather than near weissenberg
> > > > > > > >where it didnt
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >detail map & pix of the weissenberg &
> tripoint area
> > > > > > > toward the
> > > > > > > >bottom
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
> > > > > > Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the
> Web
> > > > > > http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > > >
> > > > >
>