Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: STOP Sign in Northern New Jersey
Date: Mar 15, 2005 @ 19:21
Author: Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aletheiak [mailto:aletheiak@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:12 PM
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: STOP Sign in Northern New Jersey
>
>
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/59fvv
> narrows the difference between the longest & shortest sides of
> the octagon to perhaps as little as 125 feet
> or only about 6 percent
> & all the angles measure close to perfect regularity too
>
> the directional offset of the octagon appears to follow the general
> direction of the main drag
> on which a pair of its diametric extremities evidently do fall
>
> but i guess theres nothing left to do but call boro hall
> & just ask them if they know what the deal is
>
> there is after all at least half a chance that the boro was formed &
> surveyed within living memory
>
> & another half a chance that local pride has remained aware of
> or somehow actually commemorated the unusual shape
>
> like what if they get several calls a week on this very question &
> have a faq already prepared
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
> <aletheiak@y...> wrote:
> >
> > handsome & fascinating find mike
> >
> > & tho further info on this municipality is elusive
> > its absence from a 1903 topo indicates it is relatively recent
> > & thus presumably had a fairly accurate border survey
> >
> > curiously enough tho
> > the octagon only gives the impression of having a perfectly
> > cardinal orientation
> > yet is actually off by several degrees
> >
> > &
> > measurements indicate the octagon isnt so nearly equilateral
> as
> > it looks either
> > what with the longest sides being about 200 feet longer than
> the
> > shortest
> >
> > all of which suggests someone may well have tried for but
> > somehow not quite achieved geometric perfection
> >
> >
> > but if the powers that were really did want to make the easiest
> > possible work of an otherwise hard job
> > as you surmise
> > then such minor inexactitudes as these come as no great
> > surprise either
> >
> >
> > circular municipalities are actually fairly common tho
> > especially in the postbellum south
> > nor do they even necessarily require any demarcation
> > as an examination of plains georgia for example has revealed
> > http://egroups.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/1550
> > http://topozone.com/map.asp?lat=32.03389&lon=-84.39278
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, spookymike@a...
> > wrote:
> > > For reasons unknown to me, the Borough of Sussex, in
> > Sussex County, New
> > > Jersey, is octagonally shaped. As with many other NJ
> > boroughs, towns, etc., it is
> > > completely surrounded by another municpality. Perhaps the
> > powers what be
> > > wanted to make a circular borough, but found it easier to
> > survey the eight
> > > straight segments of the octagon, rather than risk duplicating
> > the boundary mess in
> > > northern Delaware?
> > >
> > > Have a look: http://tinyurl.com/5r68d
> > >
> > > Mike Schwartz
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~-->
> Help save the life of a child. Support St. Jude Children's
> Research Hospital's
> 'Thanks & Giving.'
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/6iY7fA/5WnJAA/Y3ZIAA/WkiolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ------~->
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>