Subject: Re: AW: [BoundaryPoint] eupen and malmedy<br/>
Date: Feb 26, 2005 @ 17:18<br/>
Author: Pepijn Hendriks (&quot;Pepijn Hendriks&quot; &lt;yahoo@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="16879.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="16881.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic16853.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="16879.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="16881.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-287667480">&quot;Wolfgang Schaub&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:Wolfgang.Schaub@...">Wolfgang.Schaub@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;Article 35 refers. The new border was to be set &quot;unter Beruecksichtigung der<br/>
&gt;wirtschaftlichen Lage und der Verkehrswege&quot; = with a view on the economical<br/>
&gt;situation and traffic connections. <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Right! The treaty text I was consulting left out articles 35-39, and <br/>
I didn&#39;t notice. <br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;A special commission was to be formed to work out details, hence also<br/>
&gt;the late date at which the commission came to a final result. <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Did the commission publish a report or were the commission&#39;s findings <br/>
laid down in a treaty? Would be interesting to read this ...<br/>
<br/>
-Pepijn</div>