Subject: Re: eupen and malmedy<br/>
Date: Feb 26, 2005 @ 16:58<br/>
Author: Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell &lt;knm@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="16877.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="16879.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic16853.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="16877.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="16879.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2010030685"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;Do we define Europe geographically, politically, religiously, ethnically, <br/>
&gt;or what?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I do not see why the EU necessarily has to be restricted to Europe at all, <br/>
if countries that fit the desired criteria (whatever that is) wish to join. <br/>
In fact, the presence of Caribbean, South American and Indian Ocean <br/>
territories in the EU has already gone some way towards this.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;I would have liked to see a definition in our coming constitution<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I would actually like to have a constitution that one can reasonably hope <br/>
to read in their lifetime, but I guess a topic for another forum ;-)<br/>
<br/>
Regards,<br/>
<br/>
Kevin Meynell</div>