ok thanx
i see now
but it seems to me that if they are using the words droit & gauche
here to refer to the banks of the rivers
in the same way as we do in english
specifically
with the speaker facing downstream
then these parcels are more likely explained as some sort of
special cessions from the original condo area
that are adjacent to their metropoles
rather than separated from them
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "marcelmiquelcat"
<marcelmiquel@c...> wrote:
>
> sorry,
>
> article 2 paragraph 2 page 540 ( cf. the paragraph 1 )
>
> If there are not enclaves, Wwhy did they specially mention
these
> small pieces of land, one belonging to germany and several to
> Luxembourg?
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak"
<aletheiak@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > i dont see them yet in either case
> > but do you mean article 1 paragraph 2 page 539
> > or article 2 paragraph 2 page 540
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "marcelmiquelcat"
> > <marcelmiquel@c...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please, read the art. 2(2), of the 1984 condominium treaty.
Are
> > > these pieces of land enclaves or I have misundertood that?
> > >
> > > http://tinyurl.com/6sxjo
> > >
> > > ( page 539 )
> > >
> > > marcel