ok
thats ibs123 too
page 5 now
but what is your point here
or
what do you find remarkable in this
that you would like us all to regard
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A. Nadybal"
<lnadybal@c...> wrote:
>
> A State Department boundary study from 1972 provides the
following
> about the final borders that existed around the Walvis Bay
exclave of RSA:
>
> "The alignment of the Walvis Bay part of the South
AfricaSouth-West
> Africa boundary is based on the report and map of Wrey's
survey of
> 1885. The arbitration award of 1911 confirmed the
demarcation from
> pillars A through G, and the remainder of the boundary was not
> contested at the time of or following the arbitration proceedings
of
> Senor Prida.
>
> The Walvis Bay part of the boundary is demarcated as follows:
>
> Pillar A, situated at Pelican Point;
> Pillar B, 15 geographical [nautical, 6,080 ft.) miles, to the south
of
> the former, near the coast;
> Pillar C, behind the mission station at Rooibank;
> Pillars D, E, and F, between the preceding pillar and Ururas,
marking
> a line which separates the sand-hills from the left, or south,
bank of
> the River Kuisip;
> Pillar G, on the opposite side of the same river, coinciding with
the
> extremity of the land asked by for Mssrs. Wilmer and Evenson
in Ururas;
> Pillar H, on the top of Rooikop, in the desert of Nariep;
> Pillar J, on the top of the black rock called Nuberoff, situated on
> the south bank of the River Swakop, at a distance of 10 miles
> approximately from its mouth;
> Pillars K, L, and M, following the general direction of the course
of
> the Swakop towards the sea; and
> Pillar N, in Walfisch Bay, in front of the Resident's house
"
>
>
> Regards to all,
>
> LN