Subject: Re: 86ing update & Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Strovilia, and two more defacto tripoints (visited)
Date: Jan 21, 2005 @ 18:42
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----From: aletheia kallosSent: Friday, January 21, 2005 5:51 PMSubject: 86ing update & Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Strovilia, and two more defacto tripoints (visited)& if the strovilia clave was not occupied by any forces between 1974 & 2000but was simply an air bubble or vacuum sustained by an armistice status quountil it finally imploded for some reason in 2000as you appear to be indicatingthen these ghost tripoints were actually just the unilateral creations of the turksin their misunderstanding of the limits of the sba& so they stand or rather stood at the actual ends of the actual turkish front linewhich of course might have varied quite a bit over the 26 years of deploymentsby at least several meters probablyor even tens or hundreds of meters perhaps& de facto actually refers to this day to day & moment to moment reality& it just means what is actually in effect on the ground at any given point in timehere at big pine & mig torch keys the finishing touches are being applied to the 86ing ceremonieswhich i am expecting to conclude on schedule tonitei have decided however not to 86 all 86ing at this timebut only my own 86ingjust in case someone else would also like to bust a fatuous idea on its 86th birthday in futureso i am pleased to announce that that resource will remain available even after the party is over& i may also reserve the right to continue giving allowance indefinitely as well
aletheiak <aletheiak@...> wrote:
well yes we know all this
but you were asking about the actual tripoints
between 1974 & 2000
werent you
& whether they exist or count
or what they even were
etc
rather than just asking about the nearest convenient thing to them
so that is why i am continuing the pursuit of the actual tripoints
from where you have left off here
clearly the markers did not mark the actual tripoints but were just a
convenience in knowing the approximate locations of them
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@i...>
wrote:
> UNFICYP made the cease fire line agreement, which both greeks and
turks agreed on.
>
> So UNFICYP must have closed of the line, and cleverly used the
already physical markers.
>
> The road from marker 237 plus the land south east of Agios Nikolaos
down to the buffer zone is in any case occupied by the Turks.
>
> Jesper
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: aletheiak
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 7:30 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Strovilia, and two more defacto
tripoints (visited)
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > also jesper
> > usually
> > for dejure there is diplomatic recognition & explicit
tripartite
> agreement with ratifications etc
> >
> > but you know dejure is just a more refined development of
defacto
> anyway
> >
> > everything is defacto but only the most completed & refined
> confections deserve the name of dejure
> >
> >
> > also i am curious
> >
> > how did you decide on these exact markers as the exact
tripoints
> >
> > I have seen a map made by UNFICYP
> >
> > Jesper
>
> well ok but you say in
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/5953
> that the turks only reached the north side of the road
> yet you show marker 237 on the south side of the road
> & you also indicate a turnpoint opposite it in red line
>
> so dont you rather mean that this imaginary turnpoint is actually
the
> best available approximation of the eastern tripoint
> rather than marker 237 per se
> & that in any event both markers 233 & 237 are merely best
available
> approximations of what are actually rather more indefinite
tripoints
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'