well maestro
i can only interpret your silence to mean that you were indeed
conscious of all the belowmentioned possibilities
& thus that your multiple multipoint presentation here was indeed a
deliberate tour de force of originality
& i would only add to my applause that the very fact that this our
first multi multipoint has attained its multiple multiplicity in your
care without actually being a multipoint at all in the sense that we
have been using this word at boundarypoint means that you have
actually produced nothing less than butter out of air here as well
& without so much as laying a finger on it or even taking a bow yet
yikes
nice multipointing shot indeed
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "aletheiak" <aletheiak@y...>
wrote:
>
> it is certainly a nice shot
> & a nice site as well
> but exactly what do you mean by multipoint
>
> i suppose the fact that a commonly named point like the south pole
> could refer to several different things makes it a multipoint of
sorts
>
> & i also suppose the fact that a more specifically named point like
> the geographic south pole has occupied many different locations
over
> a period of time might make it too into a multipoint of sorts
> tho different sorts
>
> or do you just mean to refer to the ghost sexinational hendecapoint
> that formerly stood at the south pole
> aka arauclfrgbnz
> with its mishmash of 11 convergent & layered boundaries
> all of which got frozen out of existence legally in 1959
> i believe near the spot where quite a few more than only their 6
> flags fly today
>
> or do you mean to create a new multiplicity from out of all of the
> above multiplicities
> & thus our first multi multipoint
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...>
> wrote:
> > http://astro.uchicago.edu/cara/vtour/pole/poles/97marker.jpg
> >
> > From this site:
> > http://astro.uchicago.edu/cara/vtour/pole/poles/
> >
> > Jesper