Subject: Re: Tripoint Deutsches Reich - Schweiz - �sterreich 1927<br/>
Date: Jan 10, 2005 @ 21:25<br/>
Author: aletheiak (&quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="16433.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="16436.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic16387.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="16434.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="16436.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-995349034">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Anton Zeilinger&quot; <br/>
&lt;anton_zeilinger@h...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
 Plus, legal arrangements entered<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; into by the occupying power are not normally binding, see e.g. the<br/>
&gt; &gt; East Timor case before te ICJ.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>true but do you mean the international court of justice <br/>
<br/>
& is there really such a case there now<br/>
<br/>
that would be interesting<br/>
<br/>
last i heard <br/>
this was not thought to be possible <br/>
because oz had withdrawn from the jurisdiction of that court<br/>
<br/>
for example<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.timorseajustice.org/law.htm">http://www.timorseajustice.org/law.htm</a></div>