Subject: Re: Born Again Enclaves
Date: Oct 05, 2004 @ 16:48
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>is
> After a lapse of a few days, here, for your revived consideration,
> a presentation of another enclave that went away and came back.you
> didn't like the pope's possession as an example, so how about thisone?
>officials
> The Walled City of Kowloon inside British leased Hong Kong New
> Territories.
>
> Here's a short history:
>
> June 9, 1898 Convention Respecting an Extension of the Hong Kong
> Territory signed in Peking, provided that:
>
> - with respect to the walled city (Kowloon) "...Chinese
> now stationed there shall continue to exercise jurisdiction exceptas
> may be inconsistent with the military requirements for the defenseof
> Hong Kong. Within the remainder of the newly-leased territoryGreat
> Britain shall have sole jurisdiction. Chinese officials and peopleHsinan."
> shall be allowed as heretofore to use the road from Kowloon to
>of
> - "It is further agreed that the existing landing-place near
> Kowloon City shall be reserved for the convenience of Chinese
> men-of-war, merchant and passenger vessels which may lie there and
> come and go at their pleasure; and for the convenience of movement
> the officials and people within the city."Balmoral)
>
> August 6, 1898, Ratifications exchanged in London.
>
> October 20, 1898 New Territories Order in Council (Court at
> ordered (in its paragraph 4):to
>
> - Notwithstanding anything contained herein, the Chinese
> officials now stationed within the City of Kowloon shall continue
> exercize jurisdiction therein except in so far as may beinconsistent
> with the military requirements for the defense of Hong Kong.."ordered:
>
> December 27, 1899 Walled City Order in Council (Court at Windsor)
>Kowloon
> - "...Article 4 of the Order of Her Majesty in Council of the
> 20th day of October, 1898, is hereby revoked... The City of
> shall be, and the same is hereby declared, for the term of theto
> lease... part and parcel of Her Majesty's Colony of Hong Kong..."
>
> "After the war the Chinese government planned to restore her
> administration and the provincial authorities announced intention
> establish Chinese civil courts there" [Hong Kong Telegraph Dec. 6,area
> 1947].
>
> During its occupation of Hong Kong (24 Dec 1941 - Aug 1945), Japan
> evicted people from the city; during the Japanese occupation the
> was sparsely populated. In 1943 the walls were demolished toprovide
> material for Kai Tak Airport improvements. After Japan's surrender,Britain
> squatters (whether former residents or - more likely - newcomers)
> began to occupy the Walled City, resisting several attempts by
> in 1948 to drive them out. "The exact boundaries of the Walled Cityenter
> cannot now be determined". (Wesley-Smith, Unequal Treaty). With no
> wall to protect it (initially), the Walled City became a haven for
> crooks and drug addicts, as the Hong Kong Police had no right to
> the City (and mainland China refused to take care of it).thousands
>
> The 1949 foundation of the Peoples' Republic of China added
> of refugees to the population, many from Guangzhou, and by thistime,
> Britain had had enough, and simply adopted a 'hands-off' policy. Aseries
> murder that occurred in Kowloon in 1959 set off a small diplomatic
> crisis, as the two nations each tried to get the other to claim
> responsibility for a vast tract of land now virtually ruled by
> anti-Manchurian Triads. (The Triad is a collective term that
> describes many branches of the underground society based in Hong
> Kong). The Triads' rule lasted up until the mid-1970s, when a
> of over 3,000 police raids occurred in Kowloon. With the Triads'power
> diminished, a strange sort of synergy blossomed, and the WalledCity
> began to grow almost organically, the square buildings folding upinto
> one another as thousands of modifications were made, virtuallynone by
> architects, until hundreds of square metres were simply a kind ofmonolith,
> patchwork monolith. Labyrinthine corridors ran through the
> some of those being former streets (at the ground level, and oftenconstruction
> clogged up with trash), and some of those running through upper
> floors, practically between buildings. The only rules of
> were twofold: electricity had to be provided to avoid fire, and the(because
> buildings could be no more than about fourteen stories high
> of the nearby airport). A mere eight municipal pipes somehowprovided
> water to the entire structure (although more could have come frombeen
> wells). By the early 1980s, Kowloon had an estimated population of
> 35,000 - with a crime rate far below the Hong Kong average, despite
> the notable lack of any real law enforcement.
>
> Over time, both the British and Chinese governments found this
> massive, anarchic city to be a bit much - despite the low crime, if
> the 'Black Market' ever had a physical location, this would have
> it, and needless to say, the sanitary conditions were, well, a bitDictionary.com".]
> wanting. [Some Post WWII History above from the "Free
>is
> April 24, 1975, Hong Kong officials quoted as saying "Walled City
> not under the jurisdiction of the [Hong Kong] government" (SouthChina
> Morning Post).Declaration
>
> After the Joint Declaration in 1984 The Sino-British Joint
> on the Question of Hong Kong (The Joint Declaration), was signed byThe
> the Prime Ministers of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the
> United Kingdom (UK) governments on December 19, 1984 in Beijing.
> Declaration entered into force with the exchange of instruments ofthe
> ratification on May 27, 1985 and was registered by the PRC and UK
> governments at the United Nations on June 12, 1985. After the joint
> declaration in 1984, China allowed British authorities to demolish
> City and resettle its inhabitants. The mutual decision to tear downabout
> the walled city was made in 1987.
>
> Summary:
> From the De Jure standpoint:
>
> a. From the HKK-British paradigm, the enclave existed for
> 14 months (a little longer from the British home government thatwas
> not dependent upon the New Territories Orders), 1898-99.leased
>
> b. From the Chinese standpoint, it started to exist as non-
> enclave within leased New Territories at start of lease 1898; itthe
> ceased to exist as sovereignly differentiatable from surrounding
> occupied territory only during Japanese occupation 1941-5 and it
> returned to exist as non-leased territory surrounded by leased
> trerritory in 1945 when GB power returned so that exercise of lease
> terms could be resumed.
>
> From the de facto standpoint, Kowloon existed as enclave within the
> leased area under British sovereignty from beginning of the New
> Territories lease until revocation in 1899, was in limbo because
> weak Chinese government of the time could not exercise objectionsto
> British actions until the Japanese took it in 1941 when it ceasedto
> be either under British or Chinese control. It formed again whenthe
> Japanese left and lease terms resumed, but was under nominalChinese
> "control" until lease ended with British exercising minorleased
> administrative power when defense (civil and military) of the
> territory required (under the original provision of the lease from1898).
>certain
> One can say that sovereignty was shared in certain aspects at
> times,ok all very nice stuff len
> went and returned (from at lease someone's official sovereign
> standpoint) can't be denied.
>
> LN