Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Timely article about IE (ROI?)-UK
Date: Sep 24, 2004 @ 20:29
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Meynell" <knm@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Timely article about IE (ROI?)-UK
> Lowell,
>
> >If that's their choice, they shouldn't be surprised that the border attracts
> >various misconduct. They have invited it, so they shouldn't complain.
>
> I honestly didn't understand the point the article was trying to make. The
> UK and the ROI, plus the Channel Isles and the Isle of Man operate a common
> travel area, and anyone entering one member state, is free to travel
> without restriction to any of the others. If there's a problem with illegal
> immigrants (or whatever), then the problem is at the points of entry to the
> UK, not at the border.
>
> >True, but a boundary must exist if Ireland wants to be a separate nation from
> >the United Kingdom, which it became in 1921 after long agitation.
>
> Strictly speaking this is not correct. The ROI initially achieved
> self-government as the Irish Free State in 1921, but this was only dominion
> status within the (then) British Empire. It's certainly true that it
> increasingly exercised de-facto sovereignty in the inter-war years, but it
> only became a truly separate nation when a republic was declared in 1949.
>
> Even now, the UK and the ROI are still very intertwined in many ways. For
> example, there are no immigration controls between the two countries, ROI
> citizens are able to stand for and vote in UK elections, UK military forces
> are still raised in the ROI, and in many sports (e.g. rugby, cricket) the
> whole of Ireland is represented by one team.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin Meynell
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>