you think he is right about what
he says it did not disappear but continued to exist
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A. Nadybal"
<lnadybal@c...> wrote:
> I just came across a reference to this, too. At first blush, I think
> you are right...it may have fully disappeared for awhile.
> LN
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Anton Zeilinger"
> <anton_zeilinger@h...> wrote:
> > No, Jungholz was actually absorbed into the surrounding
Reichsgau
> > (Garmisch-Partenkirchen, I think, but I would have to look it
up), and
> > it was not part of the Tyrol anymore, thus not an exclave. But
its
> > communal boundaries probably remained unchanged, so it
did still
> > "exist" on a certain level, and Sorgschrofen was a communal
> quadripoint...
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A. Nadybal"
<lnadybal@c...>
> > wrote:
> > > Good point - it disappeared as an international level
enclave, but was
> > > still an exclave of Land Tirol.
> > > Len
> > >
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
> > > <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> > > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "L. A. Nadybal"
> <lnadybal@c...>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > With the Anschluß of Austria by Germany, Jungholz
disappeared
> as the
> > > > > two countries became one; and then, after WWII, it
reappeared.
> Now
> > > > > don't go splitting hairs about it being "only" a pene-. I
know, I
> > > > > know, I know.
> > > > >
> > > > > LN
> > > >
> > > > Did Jungholz really disappear? The boundaries around
Jungholz
> were no
> > > > longer international ones - but that goes for all of ATDE.
Dit
> > > > Jungholz become part of Bavaria then?
> > > >
> > > > Enclaves are special territories; their boundaries aren't
special.
> > > > They're just boundaries.
> > > >
> > > > Peter