--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
<smaardijk@y...> wrote:

> The co-ordinates are part of this protocol (art. M5.5), but were

not

> included in the online version for technical reasons, it says

here.

> They can be found in the Belgisch Staatsblad/Moniteur Belge,

26-06-

> 1996, p. 17571-17592.
>
> The enclaves are not demarcated in any way. Cf. Art. M3.c:
> "As a deviation from the Regulations for the establishment of
> boundary markers, as added to the agreement of August 8,

1843, no

> boundary markers will be established. Since the boundaries of

the

> enclaves will be unequivocally established in the national co-
> ordinate systems of both Belgium and the Netherlands, the

annexed

> maps will be drawn using these systems, and the production

and

> placement of cast-iron or hard-stone boundary markers

according to

> the regulations will be extremely costly, it is decided not to

place

> these boundary markers. The placement of boundary markers

would,

> taken into account the buildings that are located on many

enclave

> boundaries, even be impossible in those cases."
>
> Which gives a direct anwer to the question about the status of

the

> metal pipe near or at point 5109.
>
> Peter

beautifully done maestro

so
we need only learn the true coords
& then pursue our point with gps receivers

but do they mention the level of exactitude of the coords

if they were done in 1994
i would suppose centimetric to millimetric

so we already have something of a target

hmm
but i wonder how much a correspondingly precise gps receiver
would cost
even just to rent for a day