Subject: Re: Four suggestions for this group
Date: Aug 02, 2004 @ 14:51
Author: aletheiak ("aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>good
> As another newcomer, I go along with Dave.
> Of all the groups/lists/etc. to whichexactly precisely multipunctissimally so
> I subscribe, this one has some of the
> most interesting discussions,
> but is the most frustrating to readi do not think dave is frustrated in the least
> for the reasons Dave outlines.
> I noticed one message with what appearof course
> to be at twelve unedited layers of comments
> often with a single word per line.
> My eyes just glaze over and usually miss
> any bit of useful new information
> hidden in the mess.
> The lack of any grammar for some posterstrue
> (some of which appear very knowledgable)
> make any of it hard to translate.
> A FAQ and glossary of coined termsthank you
> would be a very nice addition as well.
> With such an esoteric subject,thats it again
> I understand a need for some "standard"
> appreviations, acronyms, and new words.
>
> I keep struggling through the MESSages
> because the subjects often are of interest.
> It's hard for a newcomer to become deeply involved.but that is against cosmic law
> I encourage the deeply involved to take
> some time to produce readable text.
> No one expects it to be perfect.right
> Heaven knows my notes aren't.just do it
>
> Some groups and lists periodically
> post guidelines on how to post useful messages.
> Of course, It doesn't eliminatewait
> the poorly written and constructed messages,
> but those groups do seem to do much better
> than the average. If ever a group needed
> such a thing, this one is it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ron McC.
> w2iol@a...
>
> Ronald C. McConnell, PhD
>
> WGS-84: N 40º 46' 57.6" +/-0.1"
> W 74º 41' 22.1" +/-0.1"
> FN20ps.77GU31 +/-
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~rcmcc
>
> There are two secrets to success:
> (1) Don't tell all you know.