Subject: Re: Extraterritorial marker at Buesingen<br/>
Date: Jul 27, 2004 @ 19:38<br/>
Author: aletheiak (&quot;aletheiak&quot; &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="14826.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14831.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic14805.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="14827.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="14829.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1066751495">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Jesper Nielsen&quot; <br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;   &gt; Note marker 1A on the south bank of the river. This is<br/>
&gt;   &gt; clearly intended to establish the border&#39;s trajectory<br/>
&gt;   &gt; from the shore to the thalweg.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;   right<br/>
&gt;   as recently mentioned<br/>
&gt;   this is common practice<br/>
&gt;   WELL, THE EUROPEAN ONES YOU MENTIONED WAS <br/>
 </span></blockquote>PROVEN UNFOUNDED. I DIDN&#39;T VERIFY THE ASIAN ONE YET. <br/>
NO PROOF OF COMMON PRACTISE YET.<br/>
<br/>
what are you shouting at<br/>
<br/>
trust me<br/>
<br/>
if you still dont see <br/>
keep looking & you will</div>