Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR) near DEFRLU
Date: Jul 10, 2004 @ 00:58
Author: Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


I would think that any such islands inhabited at the creation of the condominium would have been excluded from the condominium and would have remained in one country or the other.
 
Lowell G. McManus
Leesville, Louisiana, USA
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Jesper Nielsen
To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR) near DEFRLU

I drove along the DELU condo in april and so no other islands than small plots of land.
 
But I wonder if someone owns this land, and if it's government property, and which government?
 
Jesper 
----- Original Message -----
From: aletheiak
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 6:10 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR) near DEFRLU

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
<smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> I think that the condominium is formed by the entire river
between
> Luxembourg and Germany, i.e. two stretches, limited by four
straight
> lines across the river, and the respective river banks. A border
is
> normally first defined, then marked. The markers were
therefore
> placed after it was known where the border was. And that
border was
> the river bank. Now it is a bit impractical to place border
markers
> half in the water, half on the land, and anyway, the border was
> formed by a natural linear feature, namely the river bank. Some
> border markers were placed, but only at more or less
important
> places, like bridges and confluences. And at the termini of the
> condominia, of course. So these markers are bound to be
witness
> markers. By the way, there are lots of examples of border rivers
that
> have the border in the middle of the stream (mostly the
thalweg),
> with border markers on both sides that equally don't mark the
border
> exactly.
>
> But there are markings that do mark the actual border
accurately,
> nevertheless. For instance the round metal plates on bridges
and on
> the former customs house at the Keppeshausen bridgehead.
But these
> are places where manmade features cross into the
condominium, and the
> border was probably already fixed at that time.
>
> But the border stones alongside the Mosel, Sauer, and Our
are, I
> think, not exactly on the border, with the exception of the
> binational tripoint markers north and south of Vianden. But they
are
> not on the tripoints DEDELULU - they are just on DELU.
>
> Peter S.
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...>
> wrote:
> > It's a good observasion. I vaguely remember it being
disussed
> before, either on BP or at GCEBE.
> >
> > Are all DELU-LU markers (and the binational marker(s)
around
> Vianden) just witness markers?
> >
> > There should be a similar map of the northern binational
tripoint
> somwhere (or perhaps I can find it in my files). We couldn't find
any
> southern binational tripoint markers at Vianden.
> >
> > Have anybody been close to the northern binational marker
to see
> the inscription?
> >
> > Jesper
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Michael Kaufman
> >   To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> >   Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 4:45 AM
> >   Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Divided building (DEFR) near
DEFRLU
> >
> >
> >   If the condo border on the DE side is where the river meets
the
> >   cement cliff-like sidewalls, then what about the LU side of
the
> >   river?  The DELU-LU boder proceeds from the DELU-FR-LU
tripoint
> and
> >   then makes a turn to the right when it reaches a monument. 
But
> the
> >   monument is on land.  Does this mean some of the land is
condo
> >   territory?  Or is the monument a witness marker for the
triline?


just for the record
this question was first answered by peter in message 3151

& it was then first asked by jesper in message 3236

& finally mats promised to answer it in message 3281


but while seeking these original messages just to check my
sanity
i also chanced again on mats equally excellent messages 3312
& 3324
in which he reported
among many other choice details
the existence of 15 still extant condo islands

real condo land territory

places where living or native condoites might be sought

if indeed there are any such joint people living anywhere
since the demise of moresnet


so
since the defrlu island has been found to be uninhabited
can anyone identify or locate any of the remaining 14 delu
islands