hahaha
its ok
i didnt mean to inquisition you
but do my eyes deceive me or have you planted the maraschino
on our official vatican dejurcto map claim sundae
for your fig13 plus the 3rd & 4th pix at
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Arc/5319/roma-c7.htm
do sustain this hypothesized de facto vertically differentiated
proruption of ours clear to the via del mascherino
for i think your holmesean eye will agree now
the iron gate doesnt just go over the street as i first supposed
nor even just across the street as i later outguessed myself
but it is practically qed now clear to the end of the next city block
which having been resolved turns us directly back to the only
remaining piece of this puzzle or sundae
namely the italian proruption
where mats has been waiting patiently for some more
deitalianization
which i will undertake asap tho it is too lovely out today
so i must go out & play now
but it is clear where we need to focus next
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
<mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> I could be wrong about that. My statement was based solely
on
> http://www.globalgeografia.com/europa/vaticano/fig13.jpg and
accompanying text.
> The photo shows the division short of the street arch. After
now seeing Ernst's
> magnificent orthophoto and street map, I don't know if this is
the arch of the
> Via Porta Angelica or of the Via del Mascherino. Neither am I
sure that the
> former even has an arch.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 5:36 AM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Vatican boundary faith
>
>
> > you may be right about the iron gate
> > as i dont actually know where it is in relation to the arches in
the street
> >
> > & btw would like to know if you can say how you do know this
> >
> > but in any case
> > why does the official vatican map
> > http://tinyurl.com/3gjob
> > show the vatican portion of the passetto
> > aka point of interest number 26
> > prorupting far to the east
> >
> > indeed completely across the street & then some
> > if it is anywhere near to scale
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G.
McManus"
> > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > Mike wrote:
> > >
> > > > & have incidentally traded positions back again in order
to
> > > > disagree about a third detail
> > > > namely
> > > > the short proruption of the passetto into via porta angelica
> > > > or perhaps it is only above & not really into this street
> > > > & evidently only as far as the iron gate that was recently
found
> > > > but again as claimed only on the above official map
> > >
> > > The iron gate that marks the boundary on the Passetto is
on the Vatican
> > side of
> > > the archway through which the street passes. Therefore,
there is no
> > question of
> > > Vatican sovereignty "above" the street.
> > >
> > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >