Ok well at least you seem to be understanding me
better, and I understanding you better. I do enjoy
reading your try pointing and tripointing accounts. I
have probably read them all with sincere interest for
the last couple of years. So I really do mean what I
say about GNASTP. I am not trying to say anything for
effect, just for truth. And yes I know you are more
for doing and going than planning in these adventures.
But that is a good thing, as I enjoy reading the
spontaneous adventures you seem to have (TX customs
clave, etc). But I think on a large expedition with
many people on a limited time budget, there needs to
be planning.
Also, I can see how you would be responding to
everyone instead of just me. I guess I just like to
have the chance to have my own voice heard. Maybe
something along what you were saying about each of us
being individually divine - perhaps I wrongly
perceived you to be discounting that for me.
And that is what I was referring to about the "jerks"
thing. In 13490, you wrote
"which is precisely why i suggested it
as you can see again in my comments linked above
namely
to give the continent jerks a real bp ride for all
their trouble
or the best ride we can manage to give them anyway"
I think people realize there is no legal boundary
here. But in the absence of legal doctrine (national
boundaries) or mathematical/physical fact (Tropics,
Equator, parallels, meridians), why not, as you often
say, let thought create reality?
--- m06079 <
barbaria_longa@...> wrote:
> hahahahahahaha
> ok you absolutely win mike
> hahahahaha
> i couldnt stuff another byte in
> & had to cut from the bottom in order to even answer
> hahahaha
>
> so not only have you attained the elusive maxi
> message
> boundary point once again
> but
> the cosmos itself has objectively called the entire
> thread as well
> fair & square
> in your favor & honor
>
>
>
>
> & so this message now must begin a completely new
> game
> under a new title
> seeing as all the stuffing from that last game is
> now lost
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael
> Kaufman
> <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > Again, you misread and miscomprehend me.
>
> yup & yup
>
> Where did I
> > put a 2 week limit on anything?
>
> you are right
>
> you did nothing of the sort
>
> it was others who spoke in terms of 2 weeks rather
> than only 1
> week
> & not yourself
>
> & i was always considering only the ensemble
> & not necessarily only considering you
>
> again i admit this
> if it wasnt already clear the last time i admitted
> it
>
> Please point this out
> > as I never put this limit there. For some odd
> reason,
> > you keep speaking of this as though I have.
>
> so there you have the odd reason you may be seeking
>
> Second,
> > reality is to my liking, as is the reality is that
> my
> > trip does not necessitate 10,000 miles. Or 9500
> > miles. Or 11,000 miles. etc etc etc.
>
> excellent excellent excellent
>
> If you would
> > like to plan a trip that does take 10,000 miles
> that
> > is fine.
>
> i know
> i know
> i not only plan but actually take some every year
>
> No one is stopping you. In fact I'd enjoy
> > seeing your plan of one.
>
> well you already have them more or less entire in
> the archive
> but only in real time
> tripointing to labrador 2000
> tripointing to the northwest & southeast 2000 2001
> 2002 2003
> tripointing to the southwest & northeast 2000 2001
> 2002 2003
> & you know i am not so much for the planning as for
> the actual
> doing & going
>
> indeed frequently with as little planning as
> possible
>
> so as to maximize the joys of serendipity
>
> But that does not concern
> > the itinerary I personally came up with. You may
> > enjoy driving random roads from the start to
> finish,
> > but if you wish to do so, you should account for
> the
> > distances in your own trip, not force them into
> > someone elses.
>
> hahahahahaha
> i disavow & if necessary actually withdraw even any
> appearance
> or illusion of ever having forced anything into
> anything of anyone
> elses
>
> & if it was even your subjective impression that i
> have done so
> then i must be all wet at least somewhere
> since i did promise to be with you 100 percent
>
> Perhaps you could plan a GNASTP (Great
> > North American Serendipitous Tripointing
> > Peregrination) which would include thousands of
> miles
> > of allowances for driving roads from start to
> finish.
> > But that is not applicable here.
> > Also, I do feel good, as I hope you do too.
>
> yes good thank you
> for that is really all that matters
> thank you
>
> I use
> > emphasis to point out where you are
> misunderstanding
> > me, since it seems you quite often do. And I
> think
> > that perhaps it is you who should take a bp break
> > until you stop calling people "jerks" if they
> happen
> > to bring up a topic which rankles you.
>
> that was a jerky lurch
> hahaha
> & i have never been rankled by anything
> let alone here at bp
> or by a topic
> yikes
> cmon
>
> it was lowell who said he was rankled
>
> & i dont even believe he was really rankled either
>
> he just has that way of speaking
>
> & the only people i can recall calling jerks
> are those who actually do jerk the imaginary &
> already jerky
> continents & their imaginary & jerky borders about
> tho i suppose
> now that you mention it
> i would add those who try to jerk the actual
> definition of bp about
> too
> to fit their imagination or their desire
>
> but i dont fault or blame them
> or you
> or me
>
> do you
>
>
> & it was silly of me to mistake your emphasis for
> shouting
>
> & i certainly wouldnt try to stop anyone from doing
> anything
>
> well perhaps i might try to prevent them from
> harming
> themselves
>
> but even there you know
> thats very shaky ground to be on
>
> >
> > --- acroorca2002 <orc@o...> wrote:
> > > first of all mike
> > > nothing is more important than that you feel
> good
> > >
> > > so for starters
> > > please leave your problems & your shouting
> somewhere
> > > else
> > >
> > > & be sure to come back here as soon as you are
> > > feeling better
> > >
> > >
> > > puzzles we got
> > >
> > > problems not
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > secondly
> > > the reason i thought you didnt disallow peters &
> > > dougs stops is
> > > that you did explicitly disallow all my own
> > > suggested stops below
> > > but not any of the others
> > > so far as i could tell
> > >
> > > so i figured
> > > if you meant to disallow the others too
> > > then you would have said so too
> > >
> > > & now that you have said so
> > > i do understand
> > >
> > > you arent discounting them
> > >
> > > you are simply not counting them
> > >
> > > but mine you are actually discounting as well as
> not
> > > counting
> > >
> > >
> > > so this is finally
> > > exclusively & entirely
> > > your own private itinerary that you are
> measuring up
> > >
> > > i agree to that
> > >
> > >
> > > & i also agree you should measure it exactly
> however
> > > you like
> > > & should certainly ignore me & reality too
> > > & particularly all the others who think 2 weeks
> isnt
> > > enough time
> > > for alaska & new brunswick in any case whatever
> the
> > > mileage
> > > especially if thinking about us gets you
> > > disconnected from who
> > > you really are
> > >
> > >
> > > thats right
> > >
> > > unless reality is entirely to your liking
> > > i say ignore it in favor of your dreams
> > >
> > > & i will be with you 100 percent if you should
> do
> > > that
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > thirdly
> > > i havent been directing & am not directing
> anything
> > > at you
> > > but have only been talking to you
> > > & addressing what i thought you meant
> > > just as i am also addressing now what i think
> you
> > > mean now
> > >
> > >
> > > & in my view
> > > you are fine
> > > & indeed divine
> > > whatever you mean
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html