Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Jungholz - additional info on markers!
Date: Mar 09, 2004 @ 22:01
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


well.

It's very simple in my terms: x marks the spot.

Jesper
----- Original Message -----
From: "m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:56 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Jungholz - additional info on markers!


you bet

a short resume


& i apologize once again if things are not always as simple here
as we may have liked them to be

for after all
we are often talking about some rather complicated stuff
& especially so when we are really pursuing our actual bp topic
as we are doing now

& so please do help me also
by asking as specifically as possible whenever you can
positively identify any areas of uncertainty or puzzlement etc in
what i am saying


but in a nutshell
if you will bring a reliable tape measure to jungholz
then you can measure off the 261 centimeter distance that is
shown on the diagram you posted
running from the kt kataster stone to marker 110
& perhaps running specifically to the cross point depicted on
marker 110
for we dont really know that yet

& thus you can perform a first crude check on whether the
crossing point of this symbolic cross is indeed as accurate a
locator of the actual border cross point as several of us seem to
believe it is

& if your measurement reaches this cross point exactly
then you will most probably have confirmed our belief
or will have greatly buttressed it
until further measurements can be made from the other markers

but such measurements would require better equipment
so lets not even think about that yet

for once you have found in this simple way that you have most
probably arrived at the correct square centimeter
further checks might prove academic anyway

& then too you can look or probe further still
into the recessed area
for the most central &or deepest pinpoint within it

& this would advance your accuracy from the merely centimetric
to the millimetric level

& that will probably be the best anyone will ever do there


but if your measurement does not exactly coincide with this
cross point
then we have more to do here
involving several more & longer measurements
as also shown on your diagram
before we can find & verify the true border crossing point

& that is the true value to us of all these indirect supporting
markers


now i hope that at least helps
& just to keep it short
i wont say more unless there is still something you dont get


--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:
> A short resume please....
>
> Jesper
> .....................
> all in boss
>
> & happily we still do have somewhere to go & grow here
>
> for you have called the game on our most excellent adventure
> which is
> to corroborate the square centimeter of absolute truth
> & possibly even to find the square millimeter of absolute truth
> now that you have shown how we can definitely make such
tries
>
>
> for thus far
> our journey to the truth has led us to merely assume & imagine
> that the exact boundary crossing point is as indicated by the
> cross symbol on marker 110
>
> & this despite its multiple eccentricities
>
>
> but now the pursuit can be positively advanced
> by vermessungsstein or versicherungsstein or kataster
> for it is all the same to us in light of the trigonometric
exactitudes
> we now have for them all
> thanx to you
> at the bottom of
> http://tinyurl.com/ypolb
>
>
> most poignantly & specifically
> for starters
> the fact that the reference point on the kt rock is exactly 261
> centimeters from the absolute truth of the quadripoint
> yikes
>
>
> so just bring a rigid tape measure & see for yourself &
ourselves
> whether a 261 centimeter arc centered on the kt center actually
> does or actually does not sweep the exact center of the cross
> symbol on marker 110
>
> & if it does
> then our assumption is at least greatly corroborated
>
> & all that would remain for the present expedition to do is to
pay
> the most acupunctural visit it can to that symbolic crosshairs
>
> which may mean feeling your way to it with a pointier object
than
> your finger or eyeball
> in such a dark & shadowy groove or valley
>
> for we dont know exactly whats in there
> where these symbolic thalwegs meet
> unless maybe mats can answer this flat out from memory
>
>
> but anyway
> precisely therein would lie the additional quantum leap
between
> what is now only a hopefully square centimeter of truth & what
> could prove to be an utterly real square millimeter of truth
>
> & both these advances over our present knowlege may actually
> emerge here under your guidance
>
> & they would be subject only to the full trigonometric check that
> could be made by a later & better equipped expedition
> since it is always nice to leave at least something undone for
> future generations anyway
> so they too can say
> it seems like we will never get finished with this great place
>
> however even if we do finish here this time in class aa
> happily we still have the far more challenging baarle & bengali
> border crosses in our future anyway
>
> >
> > all yours
> >
> > Peter H.
> >
> >
> > de bedste hilsener
> > best regards
> > mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links




Yahoo! Groups Links