Subject: Re: MDUA no. 1<br/>
Date: Mar 02, 2004 @ 19:24<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (&quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="13379.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="13381.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic13376.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="13379.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="13381.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1595535537">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; according to this<br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.uanews.tv/archives/rferl/ukraine/ua66a.htm">http://www.uanews.tv/archives/rferl/ukraine/ua66a.htm</a><br/>
&gt; the commission was exactly on schedule there at mdrouan<br/>
&gt; & is expected to reemerge on the prut again next january <br/>
&gt; to place a presumably similar terminal marker at mdrouas <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>This article isn&#39;t entirely correct on other issues, though: the <br/>
transfer of 100 and 1000 km2 from UA to MD can&#39;t be true: that&#39;s too <br/>
huge. Maybe square _meters_ are meant (although that looks like being <br/>
too little). The land transfer at the mouth of the Danube looks like <br/>
being the part near Giurgiulesti at the mouth of the Prut into the <br/>
Danube.<br/>
<br/>
And the 7.7 km of road was only transfered in property, not in <br/>
sovereignty.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; & even without seeing the agreement <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>It is at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://ci.uz.gov.ua/c/moldova/agr_gov_stborder.html">http://ci.uz.gov.ua/c/moldova/agr_gov_stborder.html</a> (in <br/>
Ukrainian), including the additional protocol on the road transfer at <br/>
Palanca.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>