Subject: Re: Is this a ARCL border marker?<br/>
Date: Feb 25, 2004 @ 22:19<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (&quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="13310.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="13313.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic13275.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="13311.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="13313.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2082034223">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;m06079&quot; &lt;barbaria_longa@h...&gt; <br/>
wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; & maybe we can even figure out why this otherwise perfectly <br/>
&gt; meridional arcl boundary appears to lurch so at marker xxv<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I don&#39;t know, but XXVI seems to be in dispute, or was in dispute, <br/>
acc. to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.unrc.edu.ar/hielos/hist_n.htm">http://www.unrc.edu.ar/hielos/hist_n.htm</a> (&quot;Los 24 puntos sin <br/>
demarcación son: (...) Hito en la orilla norte del Canal de Beagle <br/>
(Pcia. de Tierra del Fuego)&quot;) (how a marker can be not marked puzzles <br/>
me a bit though...).<br/>
<br/>
BTW, the mixed boundary commission is known as COMIX... :-))<br/>
<br/>
The ARCL border isn&#39;t that straight on Tierra del Fuego: note the <br/>
deviation at hito XI at <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.tierradelfuego.org.ar/planeamiento/M1.htm">http://www.tierradelfuego.org.ar/planeamiento/M1.htm</a> .<br/>
<br/>
I suspect it&#39;s the same story as with CAUS: after demarcation, the <br/>
border is fixed, even if it deviates from the border definition of <br/>
the treaty.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>