Subject: Re: Three parish monument
Date: Feb 12, 2004 @ 14:31
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> Mike,http://www.bradfordhistorical.fsnet.co.uk/antiquary/third/vol04/bou
>
> >so is anyone aware of any interest in multipointing in the uk
> >be it actual or ghostly on any level
>
> There are people interested in tracing county boundaries (see
> http://www.alanheaton.co.uk/ and
>
> and indeed some parishes even continue to hold 'Beating ofthe Bounds'
> ceremonies each year(http://www.lynsted-society.co.uk/html/beating_the_bounds.html)
>
> Unfortunately,why so
> that doesn't necessary mean they don't exist.also it seems to me that what you have demonstrated is that the
>reference to
> In any case, boundaries in the UK are normally described with
> surrounding features rather being than physically delineated.You
> occasionally see old county and parish boundary stonesdotted around the
> place, but I don't believe these are officially maintained (or evenboundaries are
> relevant) any longer. AFAIK, district, borough and city
> almost never (if ever) physically marked. You have to rely onOrdnance
> Survey maps to identify them, which only provide a closeapproximation of
> the line.minimise the
>
> >& are there any known megapoints
>
> The lack of regularly-shaped divisions would appear to
> possibilities, but there might be a county quadpoint whereLincolnshire,
> Northamptonshire, Cambridgeshire (Peterborough) andRutland meet. I'll have
> to get a bigger map to verify this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kebin Meynell