--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
<smaardijk@y...> wrote:

> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "acroorca2002"

<orc@o...> wrote:

> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "pete2784west" <
> > petter.brabec@c...> wrote:
> > > Funny, the decree from 1998 does not mention the 306,9 m

from the

> > > border marker 1.
> >
> > whoops
> > you are right
> >
> > & i thought thats where you were quoting it from
> > hahaha
> > but the text in message 12459 states no such distance
> >
> > er
> > so where did you get that number from then
>
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/12472
>
> Peter S.

right of course
thanx again
& funny that the russians dont want to have anything to do with
the condo if they dont have to

for here there is no acknowledgement of it at all

or
perhaps the condo was abolished in the interim

also
if you measure this specified distance from the left bank on the
soviet map in the vicinity of the tripoint position indicated
you get a revised tripoint position much farther than halfway
across the river
casting into doubt whether the buoy line could actually be the
triline demarcation
since it only extends about halfway