> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "pete2784west" <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint/message/12472
> petter.brabec@c...> wrote:
> > Funny, the decree from 1998 does not mention the 306,9 m from the
> > border marker 1.
>
> whoops
> you are right
>
> & i thought thats where you were quoting it from
> hahaha
> but the text in message 12459 states no such distance
>
> er
> so where did you get that number from then