Subject: Re: roundabouts
Date: Jan 27, 2004 @ 19:55
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>hahahaha
> >Even in gridded streets roundabout are indeed useful.
>
> At the risk of getting off the multipoint topic,
> roundabouts here in the UK. They very effectively and safely managebecome
> low-to-medium traffic flows at intersections, although they tend to
> somewhat ineffective with extremely high traffic flows. In thesecases,
> they're usually traffic-light controlled, although astraightforward
> US-style intersection would be just as effective if perhapsslightly less
> safe (roundabouts reduce the incidences of high-speed 'broadsiding'which
> appears to be an particular problem in North America).they're
>
> The Dutch have similar-style roundabouts in places, although
> usually single lane and located at quieter intersections. TheFrench also
> have 'roundabouts', although IMO theirs work less efficiently asit's the
> cars on the roundabout that have to give way.roundabouts for
>
> >I recall someone in LA mentioning California didn't have
> >some legal reason: fear of crashes when people couldn't use themproperly,
> >and so the city didn't want the liability.area,
>
> I vaguely recall seeing a roundabout somewhere in the San Diego
> although they certainly don't seem to be commonplace.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin Meynell