Subject: Re: Texas panhandle - 3 miles into New Mexico(?)
Date: Jan 14, 2004 @ 17:34
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> Mike,first finding
>
> You wrote:
>
> > may i ask again
> > as a fitting memorial to a truly great editor
> > do you still believe he really denied anything
> > & do you still believe he was really wrong about anything
>
> I greatly respect Franklin K. Van Zandt. I've respected him since
> his work 27 years ago. He was probably the greatest Americanboundary scholar
> of all time.actually he is not known for his academic scholarship is he
>and "apparently"
> The fact that he hedged his statement with the words "appear"
> tells us that he was less than certain. Since his statement wasabout how
> things appeared to him, in that sense he was correct.you any
>
> So, do I still believe that he denied anything? If it will make
> happier, I will say that he appears to have apparently denied it.Since my
> statement is about how things appear to me, in that sense I amcorrect.
>denial of the
> The only reason that I inserted the statement about Van Zandt's
> Texas division entitlement into my original message was that Iwanted to
> acknowledge that the great man's opinion differed from mine andthat which is
> commonly accepted in Texas. I knew that if I did not, somebodywould soon tell
> me that I was wrong because Van Zandt had said otherwise.hahahahaha
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA