Subject: Re: mxn trip?
Date: Dec 11, 2003 @ 20:49
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>the
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "adamnvillani" <avillani@u...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:22 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: mxn trip?
>
>
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
> > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> >
> > > The geodesic segment originally terminated at the confluence of
> > rivers,now
> > > which was then somewhere in the bottoms northeast of what is
> > downtown Yuma.website
> >
> > I believe you are correct. Checking out the City of Yuma's
> > shows some old photographs that show Fort Yuma located on thebluff
> > on the opposite side of the Colorado, at the confluence of thetwo
> > rivers. If you look at the landforms, too, it seems more likelythat
> > the location of the confluence changed along the floodplain thererivers,
> > rather than the low mesa the town sits upon.
> >
> > In other words, the line started at the confluence of the two
> > but the border started where that line crossed the Colorado.likely
> >
> > I wonder how the western end of that line was chosen. It seems
> > that it was just chosen as a location that allowed for the areaodd
> > around San Diego Bay to be in the USA but not much more. Seems
> > that they didn't set the border on the Pacific at, say, the mouthof
> > the Tijuana River, which would be a couple miles north of whereit is.
> >Purchase
> > While we're at it, I wonder what the history of the geodetic line
> > that forms the WNW/ESE southern border of Arizona/Gadsden
> > is. How was it chosen?& then on page 29
> > extending for about 15 miles WNW of the azbcso tripoint, roughlyhttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > along the same alignment as the WNW/ESE line in question. Hmm.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> >
> >
> >