Subject: Re: Ghost binational quadropoint Denmark-Schleswig<br/>
Date: Dec 02, 2003 @ 23:09<br/>
Author: m06079 (&quot;m06079&quot; &lt;barbaria_longa@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="12420.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="12517.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic12400.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="12506.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="12508.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1451658398">on closer examination<br/>
the green arrow in your first map does not appear to point to the <br/>
same point as the red arrows in the subsequent maps point to<br/>
<br/>
but even assuming that detail is correct or corrected <br/>
still the second map <br/>
which is presumably the most historically accurate one<br/>
shows the possible border cross rather as a near miss<br/>
if indeed i am reading it correctly<br/>
<br/>
so i think you may need better proof on this one<br/>
as i believe you yourself have also suggested<br/>
but i just wanted you to have my best attention & opinion too<br/>
<br/>
--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Jesper Nielsen&quot; &lt;jesniel@i...&gt; <br/>
wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.nicolette.dk/diverse/rodding.htm">http://www.nicolette.dk/diverse/rodding.htm</a> </span></blockquote></div>