>From: "geoh88" >To: "m06079" >Subject: Re: Brownlie on Disputes >Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 01:17:16 -0000 > >Greetings. > >Would you be so kind as to provide a reference to the article or >other publication in which Brownlie "goes on qualifying & >annihilating them for pages", referring to situations which are >arguably not disputes. > >Thank you. >
>Message 11808, 2003-09-26
yes this refers to the intoduction of his treatise on african boundaries
a diplomatic encyclopedia
1979
probably london
great book & great intro in & of itself
> >--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "m06079" >wrote: > > brownlie says > > as a matter of political fact > > as reflected in international law > > the concept of a dispute involves certain specific elements > > > > it involves a disagreement between 2 states on a point of law or > > fact > > which disagreement is normally manifested by the making of a > > claim or protest > > > > the claim or protest should be expressed by properly authorized > > agents at the appropriate level & in the appropriate form > > > > in diplomatic exchanges > > > > in applications sent to the registry of the international court of > > justice > > > > at a session of a diplomatic conference > > > > or at a session of a meeting of an international organization > > > > & the claim or position expressed in the form of a protest must > > be opposed by the other state concerned > > > > > > only a proportion of the situations catalogued by some authors > > qualify as > > disputes > > > > & he goes on qualifying & annihilating them for pages > > >