still lost here in albuquerque
& glad to hear you are following thru on this research mike
but are you sure you mean follow the tp southeast
it seems to me you cant really mean that
but might mean
follow the town line west from the tripoint
or follow the town line northwest from the tripoint
& no pretty coeds in sight at the moment to ask either
--- In
BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Kaufman
<mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?
z=19&n=4750866.00011595&e=351354.999988967&datum=nad83
>
> Follow from the tp southeast along the
> Hampton-Seabrook border (crosses 5 roads before the
> rock). But most importantly, make sure you view the
> above map on 1:24K/25K and 1:50,000 scale (the rock is
> just out of sight in 1:25,000 scale).
>
> --- m06079 <barbaria_longa@h...> wrote:
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Michael
> > Kaufman"
> > <mikekaufman79@y...> wrote:
> > > Formerly formed the border between MA and NH
> > (surveyed in the
> > 1650s -
> > > the articles present different possible dates
> > 1656, 1657, 1659 as
> > to
> > > the actual marking of the border). Later on, from
> > 1768 to 1953,
> > the
> > > rock served as the tripoint marker between the New
> > Hampshire towns
> > of
> > > Hampton, Hampton Falls, and Seabrook. Now it is
> > on the the
> > Hampton-
> > > Seabrook boundary.
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.hampton.lib.nh.us/hampton/history/boundrock.htm
> > > (The 2nd article from 1971 claims it as the 2nd
> > oldest
> > bordermarker
> > > in the US.)
> > >
> > > Topozone shows the current Hampton-Hampton
> > Falls-Seabrook TP in
> > the
> > > Hampton Harbor:
> > > http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?
> > >
> >
> z=19&n=4750866.00011595&e=351354.999988967&datum=nad83
> >
> > right but this is not the location of bound rock
> > yes
> > so where do you think it is
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree