Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Yugo exclave in London used again.
Date: Oct 17, 2003 @ 17:12
Author: Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


You are right. It would need a parliament ratification.

Jesper
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Yugo exclave in London used again.


> I've never heard of this "enclave," but it probably had/has something on
the
> order of extraterritorial status analogous to that of a diplomatic
mission. I
> seriously doubt that any Prime Minister, not even Churchill, could give
away
> part of the sovereign's realm on his own authority.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 7:58 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Yugo exclave in London used again.
>
>
> > The Washington Post ran an article today about the granting and
> > restoration of citizenship by the government of Serbia and Montenegro
> > (rump-Yugoslavia) to the family of and to Crown Prince Alexander II.
> > The prince was stripped of his citizenship by Tito in 1947.
> >
> > The ceremony was held in February 2001 in the suite in Claridge's
> > Hotel that Churchill declared in 1947 as Yugoslav territory. The
> > Prince and his family returned to Belgrade in July 2001 where they now
> > live in their ancestral palace, according to the article.
> >
> > I think the group had a discussion about vertical sovereignty some
> > time back, and the suite came up when someone asked whether Yugoslavia
> > ended at the floor and ceiling.
> >
> > It's interesting that the exclave still fulfills a need once in
> > awhile. When Yugoslavia isn't using it, and a "foreigner" stays there,
> > I wonder if there are any "border" formalities at the door
> > (immigration control at the concierge or check-in counter?). Maybe we
> > have here also a case of Co- or joint or shared sovereignty? Sterling
> > accepted (alongside dinars?)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Len Nadybal
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>