Subject: Re: Ger-Lux
Date: Oct 07, 2003 @ 16:44
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS031.pdf
>of Eef
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
> <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> > A small map of the Duivelsberg area can be seen on the site
> > Berns: http://huizen.dds.nl/~eefberns/ ; click on "Nieuws vanarea;
> > anderen"; first item. The annexed area is the hatched+grey
> thestayed
> > grey area in the south-east was given back in 1963, the rest
> > Dutch.DB3HM"
> > Peter S.
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Smaardijk"
> > <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> > > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Manfred Haertel,
> > > <Manfred.Haertel@r...> wrote:back only
> > > > Were there more areas than Selfkant (which was given
> inbecame
> > > 1963)?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Manfred Härtel, DB3HM
> > >
> > > Yes, in the case of DENL, the other "bigger" area that
> Dutchnear
> > > in 1949 and German again in 1963 was the village of Elten,
> > > Emmerich. Other, much smaller areas where at variousother points
> > > along the boundary, e.g. in Suderwick, opposite Dinxperlo.1963,
> > >
> > > As far as I know, all areas were returned to Germany in
> with(DE),
> > > the exception of an area between Beek (NL) and Zyfflich
> knownDutch.
> > > as the "Duivelsberg" (Devil's mountain). This area is still
> > >
> > > Peter S.