Subject: Re: best available resolution
Date: Sep 16, 2003 @ 17:55
Author: m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> on further reflection
> i dont want to have to maintain that either western sahara or
> palestine are real countries yet
> since lets face it
> they arent
> but are still de facto parts of morocco & israel respectively
> if anything
>
> or does anyone seriously disagree
>
>
> so i would gladly sacrifice all the supposed eh & ps tripoints
> which simply means dzehma alone would bite the dust
> of all the tripoints we have previously identified as world class
>
> & dzehmr would become dzmamr
> for the time being at least
>
> btw thats ma as in maroc for morocco
> rather than mo
> which is macau
> oops
>
> but anyway the country count can thus hold steady & credible at
> 193
>
> & the world class multipoint count would decrease by 1
> from 160 or 161
> to 159 to 160
> depending as usual only on the resolution of bwnazmzw
> into 1 or 2 points
> & of course pending all other future developments too
>
>
> ahhh that feels much better already
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "m06079"
> <barbaria_longa@h...> wrote:
> > thanx kevin
> > that is a very interesting & telling comparison
> >
> > & it reminds me that since we have been counting both of the
> > western sahara eh tripoints among our global total of 160 or
> 161
> > continental multipoints
> > i think since even before eh became a glyph
> > we have actually already acknowledged western sahara as the
> > 194th country rather than just a part of morocco
> > willy nilly & ipso facto
> > even if i hadnt said so in message 1086 nor grant in 2270 &
> > 11495 etc
> >
> > so unless we want to recount or retract one of those
> > & reconsider eh as truly part of mo
> > we really need to acknowledge western sahara as a country
> >
> > & if we do regard eh as number 194
> > then it would seem all too easy & right to come into complete
> > alignment with iso too
> > & regard palestine ps as number 195
> >
> > but then there would ensue a premature search for its tripoints
> >
> > i mean other than the most presumptive egilps tripoint at gaza
> >
> > which at least would thus become a full peer with the dzehmo
> > tripoint we have already acknowledged
> > if indeed even egilps can really be counted upon either
> > in view of anticipated land swaps etc etc etc
> >
> > so of course here we are really in the future if anywhere
> > rather than in the present any more at all
> > since palestine is de facto still an unknown part of israel
> > or so it seems to me
> >
> > but the truth for now is we ourselves already have a messy self
> > contradiction over western sahara
> > whether the united nations or iso or palestine or anyone can
> > help us or not
> >
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, Kevin Meynell
> > <kevin@m...> wrote:
> > >
> > > >does it equal our same 193 entities
> > >
> > > According to the UN website, there are only 191 member
> > nations. This
> > > tallies with the ISO 3166-1 total of 195 if you include the Holy
> > See,
> > > Taiwan, Western Sahara and Palestine.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Kevin Meynell