Subject: Re: CADK<br/>
Date: Sep 01, 2003 @ 20:18<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="11491.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="11496.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic11473.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="11492.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="11494.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-632844213">jesper please<br/>
that isnt my wish nor my point<br/>
<br/>
& you know<br/>
jan takes such pride in misunderstanding me<br/>
& such pains to miss the point anyway<br/>
so really what did you expect<br/>
<br/>
my actual comment was even deleted<br/>
before the pouting ever began<br/>
<br/>
no wonder it was so easy to misunderstand me<br/>
<br/>
in fact i beg you to stay right where you are<br/>
& him to return as soon as he wishes<br/>
<br/>
& i will simplify & clarify further <br/>
because you are asking<br/>
even tho i think you too have already understood<br/>
<br/>
my point is <br/>
this is a multipointing group<br/>
<br/>
a group with not only a topic but a point<br/>
<br/>
& being on point as much as possible is the greatest part of the <br/>
point<br/>
<br/>
i know you sometimes think this is an unnecessary complication<br/>
<br/>
but being off point is really the unnecessary complication<br/>
<br/>
& being off point deliberately & continuously is downright <br/>
centrifugal if not disregardful of what we ourselves have created<br/>
<br/>
& it needs to be pointed out because otherwise people imagine <br/>
they are really on point when they are actually all wet<br/>
<br/>
& taking personal offense when it is kindly observed that you are <br/>
all wet is wetter still<br/>
<br/>
& so why not just use ibrg for international border research that <br/>
isnt on point at bp<br/>
for there at least such research is not an unnecessary <br/>
complication at all but the very essence & the point of the group<br/>
<br/>
after all didnt we create & promote & reserve it for that<br/>
<br/>
just as we created & reserved bp for multipointing<br/>
<br/>
really i thought we were trying to correct a misunderstanding<br/>
rather than just create more of it<br/>
<br/>
so i have to ask both of you<br/>
do you really seriously think i want you to leave<br/>
or are you just pouting & being provocative <br/>
<br/>
--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, &quot;Jesper Nielsen&quot; <br/>
&lt;jesniel@i...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Mike<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Do you really seriously want us to back our bags and start a <br/>
 </span></blockquote>new group?<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; jesper<br/>
&gt;   ----- Original Message ----- <br/>
&gt;   From: Jan S. Krogh <br/>
&gt;   To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com <br/>
&gt;   Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 7:47 PM<br/>
&gt;   Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: CADK<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;   Oh, yes, I am so sorry - this had of course nothing to do with <br/>
 </span></blockquote>the USA.<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;   Good bye!<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;   Jan<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;   -- <br/>
&gt;   Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.<br/>
&gt;   Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).<br/>
&gt;   Version: 7.0.167 / Virus Database: 259.11.6 - Release Date: <br/>
 </span></blockquote>28.08.03<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor <br/>
&gt;               ADVERTISEMENT<br/>
&gt;              <br/>
&gt;        <br/>
&gt;        <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt;   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of <br/>
 </span></blockquote>Service.</div>