Subject: Re: BZ-MX
Date: Aug 20, 2003 @ 01:13
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> The simple outline maps on the web sites of both the states ofCampeche and
> Quintana Roo show their boundaries in the more conventionalmanner, so I don't
> know exactly what is what.Mexican national of
>
> I have a friend who is a Mexican-born, American-educated
> German ethnicity who lives in Cozumel, Quintana Roo. I think Iwill write to
> him and see if he can give any explanation to the wildlystaggering boundaries
> shown on some maps between Quintana Roo and itsneighbors Campeche and Yucatán.
> I will report back in due time.McManus"
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:18 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: BZ-MX
>
>
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G.
> > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:to
> > > There is a good map of this remote corner of Mexico at
> > http://tinyurl.com/ki3p .
> > >
> > > This map shows considerable fine-scale revision of the
> > boundary between the
> > > Mexican states of Campeche and Quintana Roo compared
> > what is shown on mostto
> > > maps. The state boundary is the thick light gray line.
> > According to this map
> > > at least, the Mexican territory at the bzgtmx tripoint pertains
> > the state ofmap
> > > Campeche.
> > >
> > > Lowell G. McManus
> > > Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> >
> > yes & the bzgtmx tripoint if ever there should become one
> > seems likely to remain in campeche just as shown on your
> > tho i have 2 maps here showing it in quintana roo toopattern
> >
> > & tho it is shocking to see the state borders in the yucatan so
> > distorted on your map from their familiar martini glass
> >to
> > & tho the bznw corner has never been marked by bz & mx
> > but has only been defined verbally as the point on the rio azul
> > where the meridian of bzgtmx crosses it
> > aha
> > & thus there could well be some new territory added by belize
> > mexico also as a result of the bzgt settlementnew
> > & a new question as to which of these 2 mexican states this
> > territory would belong toextra 3
> >
> >
> > for belize has at least verbally conceded to guatemala the
> > & a half square mile slivergain a
> >
> > & the new bzgtmx marker has moved east from the old one to
> > attach this sliver to guatemala
> >
> > & mexico has graciously agreed to facilitate everything too
> > presumably because by the existing definition she too will
> > few extra square miles in the form of the trapezoidalprojection of
> > this sliver from the 2 bzgtmx markers to the rio azuladdition
> >
> >
> > so the resultant roughly 250 meter edge of this addition to
> > mexican territory along the rio azul would abut quintana roo
> > even as quintana roo is shown on your map
> > just as surely as the roughly 15 mile long edge of the
> > would abut only campeche as shown on your mapor
> >
> > so technically the new territory could be distributed to either
> > both of those states without loss of contiguitythan to
> >
> > & only common sense would attach it to campeche rather
> > quintana rooborder
> >
> > but given all the other nonsensical or at least inscrutable
> > squiggles mexico seems so fond & capable ofwill
> > & even assuming your map is as nearly correct as i do
> > there really is no sure way to predict which of these states
> > finally gain the newly created mexican lands abutting the newor
> > future bzgtmxterritory
> >
> > i mean
> > if it & they should ever come into existence
> >
> > but right now there is a total of about 7 square miles of
> > just blowing in the wind here among the 3 countrieshttp://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > in all 4 directions about the presumptive tripoints
> > & anything might happen or not happen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> >
> >
> >