Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Harsens Island MI border story
Date: Aug 05, 2003 @ 22:43
Author: Tom Sanders (Tom Sanders <hilversum96@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Seaway Island is natural. The border has always
followed the main shipping channel through the St.
Clair River and Lake St. Clair. I'm sure lower water
levels on the Great Lakes have left part of the island
in both countries.

One possible scenario is that the border follows an
old, smaller, channel that low water levels have
exposed. However, that would mean the small sliver of
land in the US was once a separate, named, island. And
it isn't.

It's more likely that low water has simply made Seaway
island larger. The whole region is mostly marshes,
wetlands, and sandbars. It would be easy for a sandbar
under shallow water to become permanently exposed. As
the island grew across the border, the border remained
in place. And, since it's uninhabited, neither the US
nor Canada is concerned about the island straddling
the border.

The border, all the way from Port Huron through the
St. Clair and Detroit Rivers, is carefully drawn
around even the smallest islands. So my guess is that
Seaway Island was once entirely in Canada, and nature
has permitted it to reach into the USA.

If Harsen's Island ever did secede from the USA, I'm
just wondering if Russell Island, to its north, would
go along with them. The lady who thinks Harsen's still
belongs to the Indians doesn't say if Russell Island
is part of the land never formally given to Great
Britain. There's a separate ferry from Algonac to
Russell - so, if that did happen, Russell would not be
reachable only through the Republic of Harsen's.










__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com