Well! I have tried to contribute to these discussions with intellectual
thoughts, only to have them repeatedly demeaned, most recently as "dotty." I'm
still new to this group, but it appears that intellectual thought is not welcome
here except from one person. Fine! Have it your way. In the future, I will
try to restrict my occasional contributions to facts and figures.
Lowell
----- Original Message -----
From: "acroorca2002" <orc@...>
To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 7:03 PM
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: SMOM map?
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
> <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > Acroorca wrote:
> >
> > > excuse me for tho i agree with your conclusion & you have
> > > indeed responded on point to the question up to a point
> > > this is still not a sufficient explanation of sovereignty.............
> >
> > I don't disagree with what you have written. I was endeavoring
> to explain the
> > rationale for SMOM's recognized sovereignty, not the concept of
> sovereignty in
> > general.
> >
> > Lowell
>
> lowell you said
>
> > It exists by its own power. That is what sovereignty means
>
> & that is neither what sovereignty means nor anywhere near an
> adequate explanation or description of it
> whether in this particular case or in general
> however dotty you may otherwise wish to go on us
>
> punctilious truth matters here
>
> & we are seekers not just of sovereignty
> but of multisovereign points
>
> so we had better be right on the point of what sovereignty means
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>